10-11. See also Peay's letter to BG Mountcastle, 16 October 1997, pp. 2-3. 56 See Sullivan's 9 March 1992 Message at Appendix D. See also Interview, Harper with Yarrison, 2 October 1996, p. 18. Sullivan also announced the LAM concept to the <strong>Army</strong> Staff at the General Staff Council meeting of 9 March 1992. See Memorandum for record, 9 March 1992, sub: GSC Memo #10-92, in Sullivan Papers, CSA Papers, Box 08B of 16, February-March 1992, Folder 4-2, March 1992, CSA Memorandums, file 2. 57 Memorandum for Record, LTC Rick Gutwald, CSA Staff Group, to Harper, Sullivan, Reimer, Franks, and Peay, 27 March 1992, sub: <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> IPR, 24 Mar 1992, in Sullivan Papers, CSA Chronicles,january-March 1992, Box lOA of 16, Folder 3-2, Memorandums, March 1992, file 12. See also COL Blodgett's undated, unsigned analysis of the DCSOPS-proposed charter to MG Lionetti, the TRADOC Chief of Staff, sub : <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> Charter - DCSOPS Version, which describes the many impediments Blodgett saw established in that version. One of his recommendations was that a TRADOC-LAM representative meet with a DCSOPS representative to arrive at a mutually acceptable draft charter - which is what happened. Document in LAM TF Files, Box 1, file 3-2c. 58 Memorandum for See Distribution from Harper, 25 March 1992, sub: CSA Expectations for <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> (Draft) . LTC Gutwald faxed a copy separately to COL David Blodgett, TRADOC ADCS A, GEN Franks' POC for getting LAM moving at TRADOC. Star note to Gen. Franks from LTG Peay, 9 April 1992, which forwards DCSOPS' version of the LAM charter. This document made the TRADOC commander subordinate to a LAM Decision network between him and the Chief of Staff, made him the rater of the BG heading the Task Force, and inserted the AWC Commandant as the BG's intermediate rater. It also made the DCSOPS responsible for synchronizing and integrating LAM exercises. <strong>The</strong> TRADOC Memorandum for LT G Peay from Chief of Staff, TRADOC, is dated 23 April 1992, sub : <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> Charter. Representatives were COL LeCuyer, DCSOPS, and COL Blodgett, LAM TF All documents are in LAM TF Files, Box 1, file 3-2c. 59 MFR from Gutwald, 27 March 1992, sub: <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> IPR, 24 Mar 1992, n. 57 above. 60 See n. 57 above. See also <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> briefing packet from CSA IPR in LAM TF Files, Box 1, file 3-2c. 6 1 Briefing packet, sub: <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong>, in Sullivan Papers, Harper Papers, Box 24, Miscellaneous, Folder 9, May 1992, file 2. <strong>The</strong> referenced language is on pp. 5 and 6. 6 2 In addition, Sullivan sent a separate message to GEN Fred Franks thanking him for his efforts on the charter and explaining why he had used an LOr. Memorandum for COL LeCuyer from Harper, undated but fax-machine dated 18 May 92, sub : LA Maneu- 30 verso <strong>The</strong> memo covers the signed message to GEN Franks, same subject, and the much-reworked draft LOr. It also explains to LeCuyer how Harper and Sullivan came to be rewriting the letter by themselves, though Sullivan apparently discussed the rewrite with Peay at some point. (In Sullivan Papers, CSA Papers, Box 9A of 16, April-May 1992, Folder 2-3, CSA Memorandums, May 1992, file 9.) See Appendix H for LOr. See also Memorandum, LeCuyer to BG Mountcastle, 4 December 1997, sub: Draft <strong>History</strong> of LAMTF, pp. 3-4; in historian's files. 63 Interview, COL (Ret.) David Blodgett with Yarrison, 15 August 1996, pp. 4-5. Blodgett also was the drafter of Franks' message to Sullivan, 161316Z Dec 91, sub: <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong>-A Fifty Year Stride, referenced and quoted in n. 26 above, so he was well informed early about the evolving concept. 64 Interview, Radda with Yarrison, 21 August 1996, pp. 2-6. 65 Franks also had MG Lionetti, his Chief of Staff, send a message, Personal For GEN Reimer and MG Jerrold Putman, the Commander, PERSCOM, 161920Z March 1992, sub: Executive Secretariat for <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> (LAM), in which he referred to Sullivan's guidance at the 2 March luncheon and sought the VCSI\s help in acquiring the right specialists for the new organization. 66 Interview, Radda with Yarrison, 21 August 1996, p. 6. 67 Letter, Charles M. Valliant to Yarrison, 24 August 1998, sub: Draft LAM Monograph, Jul 98, historian's files. 68 Interview, Rodgers with Yarrison, 28 June 1996, pp. 3-6. Interview, Blodgett with Yarrison, 15 August 1996, pp. 6-7. <strong>Of</strong> Rodgers, Blodgett said: "Bob ... was a Godsend. He had a great deal to do with where the <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> evolved to. He was one of the first arriving team members who was both an original thinker and able to carry a concept farther than it had gone." 69 See Letter, Valliant to Yarrison, 24 August 1998, for a discussion of this evolution. 70 John L. Romjue et al., U.S. <strong>Army</strong> Training and Doctrine Command Annual Command <strong>History</strong>, 1 January to 31 December 1992, Henry O. Malone, ed. (Fort Monroe, VA : <strong>Of</strong>fice of the Command Historian, U.S. <strong>Army</strong> TRADOC, 1993), pp. 21-23. This section, written by Dr. Anne Chapman, provides a very good synopSiS of LAM's first year from the TRADOC perspective. See also a letter from Charles M. Valliant to Yarrison, 6 November 1997, p. 10. 7l Interview, Blodgett with Yarrison, 15 August 1996, pp. 16-19. Interview, Radda with Yarrison, 21 August 1996, pp. 12-32. 72 Interview, GEN (Ret.) Jimmy D. Ross with Yarrison, 12 November 1996 and 16 January 1997, pp. 4, 7-8, 48-49, and 56-57. 73 Message, GEN Sullivan to GEN Franks, 222235Z Oct 91, sub Terminology. See also Memo- <strong>The</strong> <strong>Modern</strong> <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong>
andum for Record, 29 October 1991, sub: General Staff Council Memorandum 43-91, in which Sullivan commented on his tasking to TRADOC on owning the night. See Owning the Night Chronology, 1991- 1995, Appendix F. See also Letter, Salomon to Mountcastle, 4 August 1998, historian's files. 14 Interview, Franks with Yarrison, 18 February 1997, pp. 24-25. See also Chronology of <strong>Army</strong> Digitization Efforts, 1991-1995, Appendix G. 75 Interview, Franks with Yarrison, 18 February 1997, p. 24. 76 Romjue, American <strong>Army</strong> Doctrine for the Post Cold Wa r. pp. 74-75. 77 Briefing packet, title: Atlanta XVIII, Atlanta, Georgia, 21 April 1992, GEN Frederick M. Franks, Jr. , in historian's reference files, provided by GEN Franks. See Romjue, op. cit., pp. 55-57. See also White paper, HQ TRADOC, 4 May 1992, sub : Battle <strong>The</strong> Genesis of the <strong>Louisiana</strong> <strong>Maneuvers</strong> Laboratories: <strong>The</strong> Road to the Post Cold Wa r <strong>Army</strong>. in historian's reference files. See also Message from GEN Franks, Personal For all TRADOC school and coordinating center commandants, for info to all MACOM commanders and DCSOPS, 032248Z May 1992, sub: Commander's Intent: Battle Labs. Franks states: "Battle labs will define capabilities, identify requirements, and determine priorities for power projection army. " <strong>The</strong> name of the Battle Lab Integration and Technology Directorate (BLITD) later became Battle Lab Integration, Technology, and Concepts Directorate. See also Frederick M. Franks, "TRADOC at 20: Where Tomorrow's Victories Begin," <strong>Army</strong> : 1993-94 Green Book 43:19 (October 1993), 55. 78 Interview, Franks with Yarrison, 18 February 1997, pp. 10-12; Interview, Sullivan with Yarrison, 29 April 1997, pp. 11-13. 31
- Page 3 and 4: We live in an era of dynamic change
- Page 5 and 6: The preparation of this history of
- Page 7 and 8: THE MODERN LOUISIANA MANEUVERS CHAN
- Page 9 and 10: oritized the allocation of LAM seed
- Page 11: in the GOWGs and BoDs either had so
- Page 14 and 15: Chapter Page 4. Institutionalizing
- Page 17 and 18: On 9 March 1992, GEN Gordon R. Sull
- Page 19 and 20: gers of being unprepared. He recoun
- Page 21: Infantry Division (Mechanized) (lst
- Page 24: eral Combat Training Centers was on
- Page 27 and 28: Figure 1 A Sense of History "Strate
- Page 29 and 30: R. Gabel's recently published book,
- Page 31: quisition cycles, and save money an
- Page 34 and 35: among the players contributed great
- Page 36 and 37: BG To mmy R. Franks ODCSOPS draft c
- Page 38 and 39: the briefing and established the or
- Page 40 and 41: where and in what quantities, using
- Page 42 and 43: 1 Final Report of the Special Study
- Page 44 and 45: 29 See Interview, Nelson with Yarri
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 2 THE LOUISIANA MANEUVERS P
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 5 tual experimental work on
- Page 53 and 54: move an issue from approval by the
- Page 55 and 56: ing his own and the process could p
- Page 57 and 58: tank crews from proper attention to
- Page 59 and 60: mercially available, space-based C4
- Page 61 and 62: services participated, the Joint St
- Page 63 and 64: the Army. For all his efforts and t
- Page 65 and 66: eal understanding of what Louisiana
- Page 67 and 68: 1 GEN Sullivan to BG Mountcastle, 1
- Page 69 and 70: 26 Message from Cdr SigCen to PEOs,
- Page 71 and 72: eminded BG Eric Shinseki, the Direc
- Page 73 and 74: Chapter 3 REORIENTING LAM: THE FORC
- Page 75 and 76: Figure 7 Office of the Director Syn
- Page 78 and 79: CONTROL EVENT r-- FY 95 BA DECISION
- Page 80 and 81: ties and programs for all to see. W
- Page 82 and 83: the GOWGs in importance. In additio
- Page 84 and 85: In fact, the Force XXI Campaign sho
- Page 86 and 87: axis. In addition, ODCSOPS controll
- Page 88 and 89: 1 Memorandum for See Distribution f
- Page 90 and 91: ful enhancements to the operational
- Page 93 and 94: Chapter 4 INSTITUTIONALIZING LAM AN
- Page 95 and 96: ecause it had no orders to stop and
- Page 97 and 98:
quirements (CCIR) (see Figure 11).
- Page 99 and 100:
Reimer announced in mid-March that,
- Page 101 and 102:
I Interview, Sullivan with Yarrison
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 5 PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT AN
- Page 105 and 106:
Sullivan knew that some members of
- Page 107 and 108:
and shortly after Sullivan's term.
- Page 109 and 110:
clearer direction from the Chief fo
- Page 111:
1 Sullivan in Sullivan Papers, Pers
- Page 114 and 115:
STOW-E SWG Synch TAV TDA TOE TRADOC
- Page 116 and 117:
Army Materiel Command (AMC) MACOM
- Page 118 and 119:
Staff, Army, to execute the Louisia
- Page 120 and 121:
Appendix C MODERN LOUISIANA MANEUVE
- Page 122 and 123:
DATE 3-4 Oct 16-18 Oct Late Janearl
- Page 124 and 125:
tions, or mobilization and deployme
- Page 126 and 127:
MAJOR DUTY ASSIGNMENTS Nov 59-Feb 6
- Page 128 and 129:
FOREIGN DECORATIONS (in chronologic
- Page 130 and 131:
(OTN) assessment. Key points made a
- Page 132 and 133:
the AWD , as MG White briefed GEN F
- Page 134 and 135:
23 Letter, MG White to GEN Franks,
- Page 136 and 137:
team. This demonstration shows the
- Page 138 and 139:
ordination with the Army, to develo
- Page 140 and 141:
30 January 1995-The ADO issues the
- Page 142 and 143:
Meeting on Battlefield Digitization
- Page 145 and 146:
Appendix H MEMORANDUM FOR BG TOMMY
- Page 147 and 148:
will designate a General Officer st
- Page 149 and 150:
Appendix I CHIEF OF STAFF MESSAGE B
- Page 151 and 152:
• Responsibility will remain hier
- Page 153 and 154:
Appendix ] CHIEF OF STAFF MESSAGE L
- Page 155 and 156:
Appendix K ORAL HISTORY INTERVIEWS
- Page 157 and 158:
Abrams, GEN Creighton W: 1, 7 Adams