09.04.2013 Views

2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International

2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International

2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Aerial surveys of manatees (Trichechus manatus) in Lee County, Florida 575<br />

A Garmin GPSmap 76 recorded the survey path in each<br />

aircraft. Observers recorded the number of manatees (adults<br />

and calves), location, habitat and behavior for each sighting.<br />

Manatees within close proximity of each other and displaying<br />

similar behavior were grouped together as one sighting. Wind<br />

speed and direction were recorded based on local airport<br />

conditions. Other environmental conditions such as water<br />

clarity, percent cloud cover, and water surface conditions were<br />

estimated and recorded by the surveyor. To ensure that water<br />

clarity and visibility were acceptable for efficient spotting of<br />

manatees, surveys were terminated when sustained winds<br />

exceeded 15 knots or surface conditions scored four or higher<br />

on the Beaufort Wind Scale.<br />

Spatial analysis<br />

Kernel density estimation calculates home range and animal<br />

density by estimating the probability of locating an<br />

individual at a specific place and time (Horne and Garton<br />

2006; Worton 1995). The method creates a “kernel” or<br />

probability density over each point in a dataset (Seaman<br />

and Powell 1996). The density estimate is calculated by<br />

averaging the densities of all kernels that overlap each point.<br />

Kernel density acts as a decay-function with high estimates in<br />

locations with numerous points (sightings), and low densities<br />

in locations with few points (Seaman and Powell 1996).<br />

Using ArcGIS 9.3 (ESRI), survey data were exported as<br />

point shapefiles, and the Spatial Analyst Extension was used to<br />

calculate kernel densities for the total number of manatees per<br />

time period in the survey area. To reflect seasonal shifts,<br />

consideration of manatee distribution and habitat use is often<br />

divided into two periods: winter (November 15<strong>–</strong>March 15) and<br />

non-winter (March 16<strong>–</strong>November 14). These two seasonal<br />

designations were used to create two new point shape files<br />

from the survey point dataset. In addition, kernel densities were<br />

generated for sightings in the Central region (Fig. 1) forwinter<br />

(as usually defined, above) and three other time periods: postwinter<br />

(March 16<strong>–</strong>April 30), summer (May 1<strong>–</strong>September 30),<br />

and pre-winter (October 1<strong>–</strong>November 14). The Central region<br />

is of particular importance because 1) its seagrass beds are the<br />

closest foraging grounds to the primary warm-water refuge at<br />

the FPL power plant (Fig. 2) and 2) most manatees that use<br />

this refuge must travel through the Central region. This region<br />

was analyzed separately and according to shorter time periods<br />

in order to identify fine-scale temporal and spatial changes in<br />

the distribution of manatees in this area.<br />

An output cell size of 90 and a search radius of 2500m 2<br />

were applied to both analyses to generate density estimates<br />

for each survey point. The distribution of data was best<br />

represented on maps by using quantile classifications of<br />

numeric data. This method creates classes that may be close<br />

together in terms of the values, but provides a scale that<br />

groups the majority of the data most appropriately given the<br />

density distribution of manatees at survey points. Color<br />

intensity was used to depict areas of high and low density.<br />

Management<br />

When large numbers or notable shifts in distribution of<br />

manatees occurred, counts and observations were reported to<br />

local and state managers and shared with law enforcement via<br />

the Lee County Marine Law Enforcement Task Force<br />

(LCMLETF). This group was formed in 2003 and includes<br />

members from the Lee County Sheriff’s Office, Fort Myers<br />

Police Department, Cape Coral Police Department, Sanibel<br />

Police Department, U.S. Coast Guard Station Fort Myers<br />

Beach, U.S. Coast Guard Cutter Marlin, USFWS Division of<br />

Law Enforcement, USFWS/J.N. “Ding” Darling National<br />

Wildlife Refuge, FWC Division of Law Enforcement Fort<br />

Myers Field Office, Florida Department of Environmental<br />

Protection Division of Law Enforcement, U. S. Power<br />

Squadrons, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. The group’s<br />

Mission Statement specifically addresses resource protection:<br />

“The agencies of the Lee County Marine Law<br />

Enforcement Task Force are committed to providing<br />

the highest quality of marine law enforcement to<br />

protect the users of Lee County’s waterways, safeguard<br />

property, and conserve/protect marine life<br />

along with its environment.” (Lee County Marine<br />

Law Enforcement Task Force 2004)<br />

This well-organized group meets monthly to coordinate<br />

and maximize efforts to enforce boating safety and marine<br />

wildlife regulations. The goal of providing survey information<br />

to this task force was to allow the leaders of state and<br />

local law enforcement to deploy officers in ways that<br />

optimized manatee protection, while also ensuring that<br />

other enforcement obligations were handled as well.<br />

Current speed zone regulations for the county were<br />

acquired (Fig. 3) and compared with the kernel density maps<br />

to evaluate the zonal boundaries, both year-round and<br />

seasonal, and the potential need for regulatory improvement.<br />

Results<br />

Survey counts<br />

A total of 34 flights with both the north and south surveys<br />

completed was considered for both spatial and numerical<br />

analysis; all incomplete flights (n=3) were removed from<br />

the dataset for this analysis. Each point (n=4,000)<br />

corresponded to a sighting of 1<strong>–</strong>102 manatees. The<br />

majority of sightings were single animals or small groups<br />

(mode=1, mean=3). Total counts among survey dates for<br />

northern and southern surveys combined ranged from 135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!