2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International
2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International
2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Molecular Ecology (2007) 16,<br />
<strong>17</strong><strong>–</strong>18 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2006.03252.x<br />
Blackwell Publishing Ltd<br />
NEWS AND VIEWS<br />
PERSPECTIVE ARTICLE<br />
Whose turtles are they, anyway?<br />
JEANNE A. MORTIMER, *† PETER A. MEYLAN‡<br />
and MARYDELE DONNELLY§<br />
* Department of Zoology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA, † Island Conservation Society, Victoria, Mahe,<br />
Seychelles, ‡ Natural Sciences, Eckerd College, St. Petersburg, Florida 33711, USA, § Caribbean Conservation Corporation, Gainesville,<br />
Florida 32609, USA<br />
Abstract<br />
The hawksbill turtle ( Eretmochelys imbricata),<br />
listed since 1996 by the IUCN as Critically<br />
Endangered and by the Convention on <strong>International</strong> Trade in Endangered Species (CITES)<br />
as an Appendix I species, has been the subject of attention and controversy during the past<br />
10 years due to the efforts of some nations to re-open banned international trade. The most<br />
recent debate has centred on whether it is appropriate for Cuba to harvest hawksbills from<br />
shared foraging aggregations within her national waters. In this issue of Molecular Ecology,<br />
Bowen et al.<br />
have used molecular genetic data to show that such harvests are likely to have<br />
deleterious effects on the health of hawksbill populations throughout the Caribbean.<br />
Hawksbill trade involves ‘tortoiseshell’, the translucent<br />
scales covering the hawksbill plastron and carapace, which<br />
has been considered a precious material on par with ivory<br />
and rhinoceros horn since antiquity (according to legend,<br />
Cleopatra bathed in a tub made of tortoiseshell). Efforts<br />
to scientifically manage this resource were, in the past,<br />
hobbled by ignorance about key aspects of the hawksbill’s<br />
life cycle, most notably delayed sexual maturity (20<strong>–</strong><br />
30 years in the Caribbean and longer elsewhere) and the<br />
migratory nature of the species. Flipper tags, used in the<br />
context of much-reduced hawksbill populations and<br />
widely dispersed foraging habitats, revealed little about<br />
hawksbill migrations. Molecular genetics, however, have<br />
provided the technological breakthrough needed (Bass<br />
et al.<br />
1996). The study of Bowen et al.<br />
(2006) expands on that<br />
earlier work adding significantly to our understanding of<br />
the migrations of immature hawksbills. The authors use<br />
proven molecular techniques to examine the nesting beach<br />
origins of hawksbills on eight foraging grounds, four from<br />
previous literature and four newly sampled. The feeding<br />
grounds studied span the tropical West Atlantic from<br />
southern Texas to the US Virgin Islands, and include<br />
Inagua in the Bahamas and a site on the south coast of the<br />
Dominican Republic.<br />
The authors report that populations from 8 of 10 Caribbean<br />
nesting beaches studied are sufficiently distinct that<br />
their contribution to feeding aggregations can be estimated.<br />
The feeding aggregations show less genetic differentiation<br />
than nesting beaches but still exhibit significant differences.<br />
© 2006 The Authors<br />
Journal compilation © 2006 Blackwell Publishing Ltd<br />
Both maximum-likelihood and Bayesian mixed-stock analyses<br />
are used and yield similar results. Each of the feeding<br />
grounds (except Texas, which is the only sample consisting<br />
of pelagic-phase turtles) has significant contributions from<br />
multiple nesting beaches. Further analysis of the Bayesian<br />
results reveals strong relationships between feeding grounds<br />
and nesting beach populations: a direct relationship with<br />
nesting population size and an inverse relationship with<br />
distance between nesting and feeding sites. The management<br />
question that these authors ultimately address is how<br />
harvest of this species in one nation might affect populations<br />
elsewhere. Their mixed-stock analysis strongly corroborates<br />
evidence from tag returns, satellite tracking and<br />
previous genetic study, that harvests in any part of the<br />
Caribbean impact the species throughout the region.<br />
These results have important implications for conservation<br />
and for CITES. During 1970<strong>–</strong>92, Japan imported<br />
∼405<br />
<strong>17</strong>8 kg of ‘bekko’ (tortoiseshell) from 25 countries in<br />
Atlantic Latin America and the Caribbean (Milliken &<br />
Tokunaga 1987; Japanese Trade Statistics). This is equivalent<br />
to some 302 371 Caribbean hawksbill turtles (1.34 kg/<br />
turtle). By the mid-1980s many countries had acceded to<br />
CITES and stopped exporting shell, but Japan took a CITES<br />
reservation or exception on hawksbills, and continued to<br />
import shell until 1992 when international pressure forced<br />
her to drop the reservation and stop importing bekko. During<br />
those 22 years, Cuba harvested about 5000 turtles<br />
annually on their foraging grounds, contributing ∼33%<br />
of<br />
the total shell imports from the region (Carrillo et al.<br />
1999).