09.04.2013 Views

2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International

2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International

2012 COURSE DATES: AUGUST 4 – 17, 2012 - Sirenian International

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

331
<br />

332
<br />

333
<br />

334
<br />

335
<br />

336
<br />

337
<br />

338
<br />

339
<br />

340
<br />

341
<br />

342
<br />

343
<br />

344
<br />

345
<br />

346
<br />

347
<br />

348
<br />

349
<br />

350
<br />

351
<br />

352
<br />

353
<br />

IUCN Red List because it is a small and declining population without ongoing, effective<br />

conservation actions (Self Sullivan et al. 2011). These data provide confirmation of the<br />

appropriateness of the current IUCN status and highlight the need to improve our ability to<br />

establish the magnitude of decline.<br />

Extending our study to 15 years considerably improves our ability to detect a<br />

population trend. Over a study duration of 15 years, we would still have a limited ability to<br />

detect slight and moderate declines, but our index and protocol can detect precipitous<br />

declines within the benchmarks established in the Marine Mammal Protection Act, the<br />

IUCN Red List (Taylor et al 2007) and other publications. Taylor et al. (2007) defined a<br />

precipitous decline in marine mammal abundance as a 50 percent decline after 15 years<br />

because a 50% decline over this period would result in a stock being classified as<br />

“depleted” under the MMPA. Under the IUCN Red List guidelines, a decline of this<br />

magnitude could result in a status designation anywhere between “vulnerable” to<br />

“endangered” depending on initial population size, cause, certainty and the reversibility of<br />

the decline (IUCN 2010). IUCN Red List guidelines establish level of endangerment <strong>–</strong><br />

nearly threatened to critically endangered <strong>–</strong> based on declines of 10 <strong>–</strong> 90% over 10 years or<br />

3 generations (whichever is longer), depending on initial population size, cause, certainty<br />

and the reversibility of the decline (IUCN 2010). Bart et al. (2004) recommended a<br />

standard for landbird surveys of an 80% power to detect a 50% decline over 20 years.<br />

Similarly, Hatch (2003) recommended a standard for counts of colonial seabirds of a 90%<br />

power to detect a 50% decline over 10 years. Using this sampling regime over a 15 year<br />

time interval, we would have a power of 11%, 51% and 100% to detect slight, moderate or<br />

precipitous declines. All of our survey protocols had 100% power to detect 50% declines<br />

<strong>17</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!