10.04.2013 Views

derived categories of twisted sheaves on calabi-yau manifolds

derived categories of twisted sheaves on calabi-yau manifolds

derived categories of twisted sheaves on calabi-yau manifolds

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

116<br />

2. If <strong>on</strong>e has Db coh (X, α) ∼ = Db coh (Y ) for smooth spaces X and Y , and for α ∈<br />

Br ′ (X), does it imply that α ∈ Br(X)? This would have implicati<strong>on</strong>s for the<br />

c<strong>on</strong>jecture that Br(X) = Br ′ (X) for a smooth space X.<br />

3. What are the c<strong>on</strong>diti<strong>on</strong>s for being able to find a smooth space Y with<br />

Db coh (X, α) ∼ = Db coh (Y ), given X and α?<br />

4. What is the most general setup in which <strong>on</strong>e has<br />

D b coh(X, α) ∼ = D b coh(X, α k )<br />

for smooth X, α ∈ Br(X), k coprime to the order <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> α?<br />

5. Is there more geometry to the “virtual” K3 surfaces from Remark 5.5.4?<br />

6. In Example 6.2.3, is X 2 deformati<strong>on</strong> equivalent to X? This would give a<br />

complete counterexample to the Torelli problem (and it would also prove<br />

that X and Y are not birati<strong>on</strong>al to each other). Note that in order to prove<br />

this, it would be enough to solve the following problem: let C be a smooth<br />

curve <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> genus 1, let r and d be coprime positive integers, and let V be an<br />

irreducible vector bundle <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> rank r and degree d. Then <strong>on</strong>e would need to<br />

find a natural isomorphism<br />

H 0 (C, V ) ∼ = H 0 (C, det V ).<br />

7. What kind <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> singularities can arise through processes similar to the <strong>on</strong>e<br />

that generate the singularities <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the relative Jacobian? In all the “generic”<br />

examples I know <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these singularities are ordinary double points. Are there<br />

other cases, more degenerate?<br />

8. How should <strong>on</strong>e understand the Vafa-Witten, Aspinwall-Morris<strong>on</strong> example?<br />

What is the relati<strong>on</strong>ship <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>twisted</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>sheaves</str<strong>on</strong>g> with physics?<br />

The main cause we cannot solve more <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these issues is our lack <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> examples.<br />

These would likely provide us with a better understanding <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the theory <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>twisted</str<strong>on</strong>g><br />

<str<strong>on</strong>g>sheaves</str<strong>on</strong>g>, which would bring forth answers to some <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> these questi<strong>on</strong>s.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!