derived categories of twisted sheaves on calabi-yau manifolds
derived categories of twisted sheaves on calabi-yau manifolds
derived categories of twisted sheaves on calabi-yau manifolds
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Applying (ρ −1<br />
i )∗ we get<br />
and thus<br />
(ρ −1<br />
i )∗ O X k ij (ti − tj) = OXij (ρi(ti) − ρi(tj))<br />
= OXij (si − τij(sj))<br />
= OXij (si)<br />
−1<br />
⊗ OXij (τij(sj))<br />
= OXij (si) ⊗ τ ∗ jiOXij (−sj)<br />
= OXij (si) ⊗ OXij (−sj) ⊗ L −1<br />
ji<br />
= OXij (si) ⊗ OXij (−sj) ⊗ OXij ((k − 1)(si − sj))<br />
= OXij (k(si − sj)),<br />
ϕ ∗ (µ k i ) ∗ O X k ij (ti − tj) = µ ∗ i (ρ −1<br />
i )∗ O X k ij (ti − tj)<br />
= µ ∗ i OXij (k(si − sj)),<br />
which shows that if X is represented by α ∈ XS(JX), then X k is represented by<br />
(ϕ −1 ) ∗ α k in XS(J X k).<br />
The result about the existence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a universal sheaf is known (see, for example,<br />
[6]). But here is a quick pro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the existence <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a universal sheaf when<br />
(k, n) = 1: we <strong>on</strong>ly need to show that we can twist the universal <str<strong>on</strong>g>sheaves</str<strong>on</strong>g> described<br />
in the beginning <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the pro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> in a way that would make them glue. A computati<strong>on</strong><br />
similar to the <strong>on</strong>e d<strong>on</strong>e in Secti<strong>on</strong> 4.3 shows that<br />
Mij = Uj|Pij<br />
⊗ U −1<br />
i |Pij<br />
is equal to the pull-back <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> a line bundle Fij from X k ij, and Fij can be taken to<br />
be <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the form<br />
ρ ∗ i L −1<br />
ij = ρ∗ i OXij ((k − 1)(sj − si)).<br />
Now let S be a line bundle <strong>on</strong> X, <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> fiber degree n (such a line bundle exists<br />
globally <strong>on</strong> X, by the comments at the end <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> the previous secti<strong>on</strong>), and c<strong>on</strong>sider<br />
). We have<br />
the line bundles S ′<br />
i = ρ ∗ i Si (where Si = S |Xi<br />
(ρ −1<br />
j )∗ (S ′<br />
j ⊗ (S ′<br />
i ) −1 ) = Sj ⊗ τ ∗ ijS −1<br />
i<br />
= Sj ⊗ S −1<br />
i<br />
⊗−n<br />
⊗ L<br />
= OXij (−n(k − 1)(si − sj)).<br />
Therefore, c<strong>on</strong>sidering the collecti<strong>on</strong>s <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> line bundles {O X k i (ti)} and {S ′<br />
i }, we<br />
see that their coboundaries are {O(k(si −sj))} and {O(−n(k −1)(si −sj))} (where<br />
we have omitted the subscript Xij and the pull-backs by isomorphisms to X k<br />
because these do not matter, since we are dealing with line bundles <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> degree 0).<br />
Since k and −n(k − 1) are coprime, we can obtain any multiple <str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> {O(si − sj)} out<br />
<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g> them, in particular we can c<strong>on</strong>struct {O((k − 1)(sj − si))}, which we have seen<br />
is the obstructi<strong>on</strong> to gluing the Ui’s together. Therefore this obstructi<strong>on</strong> is trivial,<br />
and hence the Ui’s can be glued to form a global universal sheaf, thus finishing<br />
the pro<str<strong>on</strong>g>of</str<strong>on</strong>g>.<br />
ij<br />
60