al_etidaal_gn
al_etidaal_gn
al_etidaal_gn
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
mujtahid.” (Jami). The “i<strong>gn</strong>orant mujtahid” is that person who has no knowledge and<br />
then out of his own reasoning passes opinions on matters of deen.<br />
There is a grave warning in many reports of a Hadeeth wherein Rasulullah (S<strong>al</strong>l<strong>al</strong>lahu<br />
Alayhi Was<strong>al</strong>lam) said: “Whosoever utters any opinion of himself about the Quran<br />
(tafseer) should now <strong>al</strong>ready take his place in hell.”<br />
Why differences In deen?<br />
People who are conversant with deen often have a problem which they find difficult<br />
to solve or answer. The problem is this: In the physic<strong>al</strong> sciences, natur<strong>al</strong> sciences,<br />
mathematics, arithmetic etc. you do not see any differences of opinion. But how is it<br />
that in the religious sciences and theology there <strong>al</strong>ways seem to be differences of<br />
opinions, different viewpoints, different theories and explanations? From time<br />
immemori<strong>al</strong> till today there never has been any era when there were no differences in<br />
religion. The irreligious ones have taken this problem so seriously that they reached<br />
the stage where they point-blankly rejected religion itself as a re<strong>al</strong>ity, disbelieving in<br />
it completely. Others again have accepted religion itself, but denied theology<br />
(deeniyat) and adherence to deen. These people should have known, that according to<br />
their own admission (that there has <strong>al</strong>ways been dissent), this dissent is a natur<strong>al</strong><br />
phenomenon which is in itself quite necessary. Otherwise, how would it have been<br />
possible for it to exist continuously over thousands of years from era to era. We do<br />
not even know how many sages and philosophers, men of exception<strong>al</strong> wisdom, have<br />
passed through its ways.<br />
Now for the answer to this query. Actu<strong>al</strong>ly, this objection against deen results<br />
primarily from not being well-conversant with deen. Basic<strong>al</strong>ly there are two causes<br />
for dissent in deen. One pertains to differences in the basic fundament<strong>al</strong>s (usool) and<br />
the other concerns differences in the lesser, subdivision<strong>al</strong>s (furoo-i), of non-principle<br />
stature.<br />
When religions differ in basic, fundament<strong>al</strong>, principle matters it is because of a<br />
specific reason. Deen is the name given to that institution of acting upon the<br />
commands and instructions of the Creator of the World. And for the Lord of the<br />
World it is true that He should set forth such orders and proclamations which are<br />
suitable and in the welfare of His creatures at any specific time. None can object to<br />
Him changing His orders from time to time. And neither can any stupid, fault-finding<br />
soul object that yesterday such-and-such a master commanded his servant to do this<br />
or that. And now the commands are <strong>al</strong>tered. And why does He now give him other<br />
commands? Any ruler has the right to pass any law in the welfare and interests of his<br />
subjects, and later when circumstances <strong>al</strong>ter, he has the right to bring about certain<br />
necessary changes.<br />
In this same manner the Lord and Controller of the World <strong>al</strong>so, for the various<br />
Ummahs in different eras have brought about certain amendments in his<br />
commandments which were suitable for the specific conditions that prevailed. But<br />
this was done while retaining the same fundament<strong>al</strong>s right through. Now in view of<br />
Al- Eti’da<strong>al</strong> Fi Maraatibur- Rija<strong>al</strong> 172