30.04.2013 Views

The Sterling genealogy

The Sterling genealogy

The Sterling genealogy

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chronological 31 noer<br />

of emigrations to<br />

toertca: 1635=1783<br />

WILLIAM STERLING, born about 1617; emigrated<br />

in 1635; settled in Hungars Parish, Northampton<br />

Count}', Virginia. (See page 228.)<br />

DAVID STERLING, JOHN STERLING, supposedly<br />

brothers, sailed from Gravesend, the port of London, England,<br />

Nov. 8, 1651, " In the Jno. & Sara of London, John Greene m r<br />

Yronworke & house hold stuffe & other p r ovisions for Plante rs<br />

and Scotch p r isone r s free by ordinance of Parliament dat 20th of<br />

Octobe r 1651." (Suffolk (Mass.) Deeds, Lib. 1, p. 6.)<br />

King Charles I was beheaded in 1649, and the Commonwealth,<br />

under the Protector, Oliver Cromwell, existed until the Restoration<br />

in 1660. John and David <strong>Sterling</strong>, or Stirling, were, without doubt,<br />

immediate members of the Scotch family of Stirling who espoused<br />

the cause of Charles I. <strong>The</strong>y landed at Charlestown, Mass., May<br />

12, 1652. (Records of Charlestown.) It is fair to suppose that<br />

they, in common with other Scotch exiles, returned to their native<br />

country before or upon the Restoration. No further mention<br />

has been found of John or David <strong>Sterling</strong> in Massachusetts records,<br />

although much time has been given to the search. According to<br />

the " Register of the Stirlings of Keir," a manuscript pedigree<br />

connecting the American and Scottish families, somewhat gener-<br />

ally circulated among one branch of the former house, David, the<br />

younger, born, according to the Register, in 1622, was the father<br />

of William <strong>Sterling</strong> of Rowley and Haverhill, Mass., and Lyme,<br />

Conn., founder of the larger family of the name in America, thus<br />

connecting him directly with the house of Stirling of Keir. This<br />

matter is elsewhere dealt with and the impossibility of the connec-<br />

tion sufficiently demonstrated.<br />

It is enough to state here that David could not well have been<br />

born earlier than the date given, 1622, and William, of Haverhill,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!