View Document Here - Hanford Site
View Document Here - Hanford Site
View Document Here - Hanford Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
^<br />
..'. /<br />
Appendix H- Detailed Description of Alternative 6: DOE(R1.-2001-11<br />
Close in Place - Collapsed Structure 1tev.1A rA(t<br />
$edline/Strikcou{<br />
7. Following minor mechanical modification and recertification, the existing main crane in the<br />
221-U Facility would be functional and ready for use in Alternative 6 activities. Crane use<br />
would be limited to moving of equipment from the process cells to the canyon fieer4 c c<br />
where the equipment would be size reduced as necessary and placed back into the cells. The<br />
main crane would also be used to move the equipment from the canyon deck during size and<br />
volume reduction and placement into the process cells. The crane would be used for cover<br />
block movement, as well.<br />
3^<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
7<br />
8<br />
9 8. All underground piping systems located beneath the environmental cap footprint for<br />
10 Alternative 6 would be ¢routed in place or removed based on the outcome of risk as<br />
11 work. -This-J(:removed. the waste would be disposed at ERDF.<br />
12<br />
13<br />
14<br />
15<br />
16<br />
17<br />
18<br />
19<br />
9. The 221-U Canyon Aeerdc k elevation is estimated at 221.5 m (726.5 ft).<br />
20 11. The 221-U Facility is located within the exclusive land•use boundary identified in the Final<br />
^21 <strong>Hanford</strong> Comprehensive Land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement (DOE 1999) and<br />
22 the associated "<strong>Hanford</strong> Comprehensive land-Use Plan Environmental Impact Statement<br />
23 (HCP EIS), <strong>Hanford</strong> <strong>Site</strong>, Richland, Washington: Record of Decision (ROD)" (64 Federal<br />
24 Register 61615). This implies that the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) would remain in<br />
25 control of the 200 Areas and industrial-exclusive land use would be limited to waste<br />
26<br />
27<br />
management activities.<br />
28 12. Decontamination limits for loose surface and fixed contamination would be based on<br />
29 preliminary remediation goals.<br />
30<br />
31<br />
nteFy fer<br />
32 dispesel et921U.<br />
33 44:1LOnly Aemedietien-lcgacv eauinment from 221-U<br />
34 Rrocess cells and tmeratiagAocxt:anyon deck would be disposed in the facility. No new<br />
35 waste from outside 221 -ILwould be placed in the process cells or galleries or around the<br />
36<br />
37<br />
38<br />
39<br />
40<br />
41<br />
42<br />
43<br />
exterior of the buildinp-<br />
44<br />
45<br />
46:J4. Because of the uncertainties associated with the volume of contaminated equipment<br />
currently located on the canyon fleerie and inside of the process cells of 221-U and with<br />
10. The canyon interior (including the process cells, hot pipe trench, and associated ventilation<br />
tunnel) and the rail tunnel interior are considered contaminated. The galleries are considered<br />
to be uncontaminated except for some areas of the southeast wall that would require fixative<br />
application.<br />
Final Feasibility Studyjorthe Canyon Disposition Initiative (221-U Facility)<br />
)uno 2003 11-3