View Document Here - Hanford Site

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix D-- Slope Stability Analysis for DOEtRt,-2001-11 Environmental Cap Rev.p t Drafi g Redlinc/Strikcou 1 2 3 4. The effects of soil-structure interaction for the building and adjacent fill materials should be consideted Analyses should be performed to evaluate the effects of potential differential 4 5 6 response to seismic ground motions between the fairly rigid 221-U Facility concrete structure and the comparatively flexible filI materials placed around the exterior of the facility. 7 5. Final design should also pursue the technological challenge of attempting to design a barrier 8 that will providc containment to the 221-U Facility and to adjacent waste sites while 9 10 11 maintaining the barrier footprint developed in this FS for Alternatives 3, 4, and 6. 12 13 D.6 REFERENCES 14 Baxter,l. T., 2000, 221-U Conceptual Structural Study (CSS)forthe Canyon Disposition 15 16 lnitiative (CDI), HNF-6325, Rev. 0, Fluor Hanford, Inc., Richland, Washington. 17 Casbon, M. A.,1995, Design Analysis, Construction ofW296 Environmental Restoration 18 Disposal Facility, BHI-00355, Rev. 00, Vol. 1, Bechtel Hanford, Inc., Richland, 19 ^20 Washington. ( ?1 CH2M HILJ., 2001, Engineering Design File, Draft Slope Stability Assessments, INEEL, 22 23 EDF-ER-268, CH2M HILL, Idaho Falls, Idaho. 24 DOE 0 5480.28, Natural Phenomenon llazards Mitigation, U.S. Department of Energy, 25 26 Washington, D.C. 27 28 DOE 0 6430.IA, General Design Criteria, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 29 DOE, 1996, Natural Phenomena Hatards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of 30 31 32 Energy Facilities, DOE-STD-1020-94, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C. 33 34 35 36 DOE-RL,1996, Focused Feasibility Study ofEngineered Barriers for Waste Management Units in the 200 Areas, DOEIRL-93-33, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy. Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington. 37 DOE-RL, 1998. Phase I Feasibility Study for the Canyon Disposition Initiative (221-U Facility), 38 39 40 DOE//Rllr97-11, Rev.1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office, Richland, Washington. 41 Druschel, S. J. and E. R. Underwood, 1993, "Design of Irning and Cover System Sideslopes:' 42 accepted for publication and presentation, Geosyntlietics '93 Conference, Industrial ('43 44 Fabrics Association International, Vancouver, B.C. Final Feasibility Surdyfor the Canyon DisposiNon laitiative (221-U Faciliry) '1 003 D-9
Appendix D - Slope Stability Analysis for DOFJRL-2001-11 Environmental Cap Rev. AI Dref D r„% I Redline/Strikeout 1 Makdisi, F. A. and H. B. Seed, 1978, "Simplified Procedure for Estimating Dam and 2 Embankment Parthquake-Induced Deformations," American Society of Civil Engineers, 3 Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, July, pp. 849-867. 4 5 Makdisi, F. A. and H. B. Seed, 1979, "Simplified Procedure for Evaluating Embankmcnt 6 Response," American Society of Civil Engineers, Journal of the Geotechnical 7 Engineering Division, December, pp. 1427-1434. 8 9 Saleh, A. A. and D. E. Daniel, 1994, Preliminary Stability Analyses for Prototype Surface 10 Barrier- 200 East Area, prepared for Bechtel Hanford, Inc., Contract MJF-SCV-298796, 11 by the University of Texas, Department of Civil Engineering, Austin, Texas. 12 13 Seed, R. H. and It. Bonaparte, 1992, "Seismic Analysis and Design of Lined Waste Fills: 14 Current Practice," Stability and Performance ofSlopes and Embankments I1, American 15 Society of Civil Engineers, Vol. 2, pp. 1521-1545. 16 17 Skriba, M. C., 1997, "Engineering Design Evaluation," Project Hanford Policy and Procedure 18 System. HNFRPRO-97, p. 41, Fluor Hanford, Inc., Richland, Washington. 19 20 Skelly, W. A., C. J. Chou, J. W. Lindberg, and D. J. Hoff, 1994, Material Properties Data and r 21 Volume Estimate of Silt Loam Soil at the NRDWL Reserve, McGee Ranch, 22 WHC-SD-ENTI-218, Rev. 0, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, Washington. 23 24 Stark, T. D. and A. It. Poeppe1,1994, "Landitll liner Interface Strengths, Torsional Ring Shear 25 Strength."JournalofGeotechnicalEng(neering,ASCE,Vol.120,No.3. 26 27 WHC, 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis, DOE Hanford Site, Washington, 28 WHC-SD-W236A-TI-002, Rev. IA, Westinghouse Hanford Company, Richland, 29 Washington. 30 Final Feasibility Study for tlhe Canyon Disposition inirfatire (221-U Facility) June 20Q1 D-10
Page 1 and 2: AR TARGET SHEET The following docum
Page 3 and 4: (^N r^ r Proposed Plan for the Cany
Page 5 and 6: i^ f 1 2 3 S 6 7 8 9 11 12 13 14 15
Page 7 and 8: (^N (0-^, (^N 1 2 3 r• • .`•
Page 9 and 10: ^ (^N t^ the steHitFths+amedielaeti
Page 11 and 12: o"N DOF/RIr2001-29 Draft D Redline/
Page 13 and 14: (^N i0,"% / ' DOF/RL-2001-29 Draft
Page 15 and 16: fO'^, ^ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
Page 17 and 18: I f^ ^ DOE!RL-2001-29 Ikaft D Redli
Page 19 and 20: ^ ^ ^ 1 1 119 12 13 14 15 19 17 1 I
Page 21 and 22: ! ' t^ Project Prepare the existing
Page 23 and 24: f ' ^ rN 100 I Noise, Visual, and A
Page 25 and 26: ^ POINTS OF CONTA CP ^ U.S. Drnartm
Page 27 and 28: f^ n DOF/RL-2001-29 Draft D Redlinc
Page 29 and 30: noFIRL-2001-11 Rev. p 1 1)raft P ^
Page 31 and 32: ^ ^ 1 2 DOFJRL-2001-11 Rev.A 1 Dra(
Page 33 and 34: . . .,.. Appendix C - Risk Modeling
Page 35 and 36: n 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 37 and 38: t^ Appendix C - Risk Modeling of an
Page 39 and 40: (_^% ^ ^ 11 Appendix C - Risk Model
Page 41 and 42: (0"% t^ DOFJRL-2001-1 l Rev. N 1 Dr
Page 43 and 44: 1 ' ^ ^ DOEJRL-2001-1 t Rev.H1 nraf
Page 45 and 46: Appendix D- Slope Stability Analysi
Page 47 and 48: Appendix D - Slope Stability Analys
Page 49 and 50: (^N Appendix D- Slope Stability Ana
Page 51: Appendix D - Slope Stability Analys
Page 55 and 56: Appendix D - Slope Stability Analys
Page 57 and 58: • Appendix D-Slope Stability Anal
Page 59 and 60: ^• r^, r^ 2 3 4 5 6 7 Appendix D-
Page 61 and 62: ^ Appendix D-- Slope Stability Anal
Page 63 and 64: ^ (00h^' ^ 2 DOFIRI^2001-I I Rev. J
Page 65 and 66: t^` ^ ^ 1 2 DOFJRL-2001-11 Rev. JDr
Page 67 and 68: Appendix E - Detailed Description o
Page 71 and 72: Appendix E- Detaiied Description of
Page 73 and 74: t^' Appendix E -Detailed Descriptio
Page 79 and 80: f,^N Appendix E - Detailed Descript
Page 87 and 88: (0^s 1,^N Appendix E - Detailed Des
Page 89 and 90: i^ r^'. ^ 1 2 DOFJRL-2001-11 Rev. 8
Page 91 and 92: ^ ^ t^ 2 DOEIRL-2001-11 Rev. H Ihaf
Page 93 and 94: Appendix F - Detailed Description o
Page 95 and 96: Appendix F -Detailed Description of
Page 97 and 98: Appendix T- Detailed Description of
Page 99 and 100: Appendix F - Detailed Description o
Page 101 and 102: Appendix F -Detailed Description of
Page 103 and 104:
(O^N Appendix F - Detailed Descript
Page 105 and 106:
Appendix F - Detailed Description o
Page 107 and 108:
Appendix E- Detailed Description of
Page 109 and 110:
..^•. , Appendix F- Detailed Desc
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
(^, Appendix F - Detailed Descripti
Page 117 and 118:
(^N f ` Appendix F - Detailed Descr
Page 119 and 120:
Appendix F-Detailerl Description of
Page 121 and 122:
^`} Appendix F - Detailed Descripti
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
^ (10^' (^N DOF/RL-2001-11 Rev. AjD
Page 127 and 128:
^N r^ 1 n DOF/RLr2061-1 l ' Rev. I
Page 129 and 130:
1 ^ (^N ^ DoFJRL-M-t t ^ Rev. I Dnf
Page 131 and 132:
Appendix G -Detailed Description of
Page 133 and 134:
Appendix G - Detailed Description o
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Appendix G- Detailed Description of
Page 141 and 142:
... ,. Appendix G - Detailed DescrI
Page 143 and 144:
o"^, Appendix G - Detailed Descript
Page 145 and 146:
- •s. t .W ;. . Appendix G - Deta
Page 147 and 148:
.. . .,. .. . Appendix G- Detailed
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Appendix G -Detailed Description of
Page 153 and 154:
i^ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 155 and 156:
^ . , , ,... Appendix G - Detailed
Page 157 and 158:
^• f f 2 3 Appendix G- Detailed D
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Appendix G- Detailed Description of
Page 163 and 164:
^• ^ Appendix G - Detailed Descri
Page 165 and 166:
^ ^ t"'^N 1 2 DOElRL-2001-I1 Rev. 9
Page 167 and 168:
t^N (M"N Final Feasibifity Stady ja
Page 169 and 170:
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
Page 171 and 172:
(00^1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 1
Page 173 and 174:
,.r.. . Appendix H - Detailed Descr
Page 175 and 176:
(^\ Appendix H - Detailed Descripti
Page 177 and 178:
Appendix H - Detailed Description o
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Appendix N- Detailed Description of
Page 183 and 184:
1 2 3 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1
Page 185 and 186:
Appendix It - Detailed Description
Page 187 and 188:
(^N 5 6 7 8 9 to 11 12 13 14 15 16
Page 189 and 190:
^. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14
Page 191 and 192:
^N i ' (0-1% C Appendix H- Detailed
Page 193 and 194:
^ (' ^ Appendix H- Detailed Descrip
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Appendix H-Detailed Description of
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
f^ ^ DOFJRL-2001-I I Rev. N raft Rc
Page 203 and 204:
f^ ^ 1 2 DOFlRI.-2001-11 Rev. pI af
Page 205 and 206:
I ,.,. , ... . DOFJRI.-2001-11 Appe
Page 207 and 208:
^ DOF/RL-2001-11 I Appendix I - Dec
Page 209 and 210:
DOFJRI.-2001-11 I Appendix I- Decom
Page 211 and 212:
^ DOFlRI.•2001-11 Appendix I -Dec
Page 213 and 214:
^'. DoEIR1.-2001-11 Appendix I-Deco
Page 215 and 216:
^ n ^ DOF1RG2001-11 Appendix I - De
Page 217 and 218:
^ ("` ^ DOFJRI.2001-11 Rev. G I. Dr
Page 219 and 220:
^ r^, TABLES DOFJRIr2001-11 • Rev
Page 221 and 222:
^ Appendix J- Applicable or Relevan
Page 223 and 224:
t^ ^ Appendix J-Applicable or Relev
Page 225 and 226:
^ Appendia J- Applicable or Relevan
show all

View Document Here - Hanford Site

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?