View Document Here - Hanford Site
View Document Here - Hanford Site
View Document Here - Hanford Site
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
t^<br />
^<br />
Appendix J-Applicable or Relevant and,- • DoFJRL2001t 1' ^<br />
•Appropriate<br />
Requirements Rev.4 1 Draft Ba. ^ =•,<br />
Redline/Strikeout<br />
Alternatives that involve facility demolition or the removal of waste or contaminated media or<br />
ex situ treatment may generate solid, dangerous, or radioactive waste. The RCRA requirements<br />
are applicable to those alternatives that margenerate, treat, store, or dispose of solid or<br />
dangerous waste. The substantive requirements of 10 CFR 61 are potentiall^• relevant and<br />
appropriate to those alternatives that g0liffater}reat-Pr-dispose of radioactive waste in situ .-,44<br />
Waste would be disposed to the Environmental Restoration<br />
Disposal Facility (ERDF), which is designed to meet the requirements of RCRA. TSCA, and<br />
8>zlow-Ievel radioactive waste standards. For alternatives that involve leaving solid or<br />
dangerous waste in place, RCRA performance standards for landfill covers are relevant and<br />
appropriate and will be incorporated into the design. Cover performance standards contained in<br />
10 CFR 61 are potentiallv relevant and appropriate to the in-place disposal of radioactive waste.<br />
The following information provides an analysis of how each alternative is anticipated to comply<br />
with the ARARs and TBCs for waste management.<br />
J3.1 Full Removal and Disposal Alternative (Alternative 1)<br />
Large quantities of soil and debris (e.g., piping, structures, and cleanup materials) will be<br />
generated under this alternative. Some of these wastes may require treatment or a waiver from<br />
LDRs i+:oi•.kr-to be disposed at the ERDF or offsite waste disposal facility. It is anticipated that<br />
compliance with waste management standards will be achievable for the types of waste and<br />
contaminants that may Ae-required to he treatmented andtor disposed. Due to the potential for<br />
much greater quantities of waste to be generated from this alternative, waste management<br />
ARAR/1BC compliance will be more complex for this alternative rslati+e te than for the disposal<br />
alternatives. Treatment actions may generate treatment residuals that potentially could require<br />
treatment prior to disposal at the ERDF or another disposal unit to comply with applicable<br />
requirements .<br />
J3.2 Containment Alternatives (Alternatives 3,4, and 6)<br />
collection m•stems willwakt be souehlrrwsired hecauso the huttom containment scstem (the floor<br />
Flrtal Feasibility Studyfor the Canyon Disposition In(t(atfve (111-U PacUtry)<br />
9 ipl iaAos '100 FSeptember ^0" _ .14