19.05.2013 Views

View Document Here - Hanford Site

View Document Here - Hanford Site

View Document Here - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

t^<br />

^<br />

Appendix J-Applicable or Relevant and,- • DoFJRL2001t 1' ^<br />

•Appropriate<br />

Requirements Rev.4 1 Draft Ba. ^ =•,<br />

Redline/Strikeout<br />

Alternatives that involve facility demolition or the removal of waste or contaminated media or<br />

ex situ treatment may generate solid, dangerous, or radioactive waste. The RCRA requirements<br />

are applicable to those alternatives that margenerate, treat, store, or dispose of solid or<br />

dangerous waste. The substantive requirements of 10 CFR 61 are potentiall^• relevant and<br />

appropriate to those alternatives that g0liffater}reat-Pr-dispose of radioactive waste in situ .-,44<br />

Waste would be disposed to the Environmental Restoration<br />

Disposal Facility (ERDF), which is designed to meet the requirements of RCRA. TSCA, and<br />

8>zlow-Ievel radioactive waste standards. For alternatives that involve leaving solid or<br />

dangerous waste in place, RCRA performance standards for landfill covers are relevant and<br />

appropriate and will be incorporated into the design. Cover performance standards contained in<br />

10 CFR 61 are potentiallv relevant and appropriate to the in-place disposal of radioactive waste.<br />

The following information provides an analysis of how each alternative is anticipated to comply<br />

with the ARARs and TBCs for waste management.<br />

J3.1 Full Removal and Disposal Alternative (Alternative 1)<br />

Large quantities of soil and debris (e.g., piping, structures, and cleanup materials) will be<br />

generated under this alternative. Some of these wastes may require treatment or a waiver from<br />

LDRs i+:oi•.kr-to be disposed at the ERDF or offsite waste disposal facility. It is anticipated that<br />

compliance with waste management standards will be achievable for the types of waste and<br />

contaminants that may Ae-required to he treatmented andtor disposed. Due to the potential for<br />

much greater quantities of waste to be generated from this alternative, waste management<br />

ARAR/1BC compliance will be more complex for this alternative rslati+e te than for the disposal<br />

alternatives. Treatment actions may generate treatment residuals that potentially could require<br />

treatment prior to disposal at the ERDF or another disposal unit to comply with applicable<br />

requirements .<br />

J3.2 Containment Alternatives (Alternatives 3,4, and 6)<br />

collection m•stems willwakt be souehlrrwsired hecauso the huttom containment scstem (the floor<br />

Flrtal Feasibility Studyfor the Canyon Disposition In(t(atfve (111-U PacUtry)<br />

9 ipl iaAos '100 FSeptember ^0" _ .14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!