19.05.2013 Views

View Document Here - Hanford Site

View Document Here - Hanford Site

View Document Here - Hanford Site

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

^<br />

Appendia J- Applicable or Relevant and • ' DoE/ltt,100l-1 t<br />

Appropriate Requirements .. - Rev, e t orArt s,a<br />

Redline/Strikeout<br />

solidified mass. _In addition, under all of the disposal alternatives, TRU waste in sludge and<br />

17nu:.i :w #wnb in enA C_6 wnnl.l h. ....nv..l a..d di,,.,..n-.i<br />

.,.<br />

J.4 WASTEWATER MANAGEMENT STANDARDS<br />

The federal Clean iVaterAct oj1977 (CWA) cefltrels re ^tttlatas discharges of pollutants to<br />

surface waters. The '<br />

173-216 establishes requirements for discharges to waters of the state through the soil column to<br />

ensure that applicable surface water quality standards are met and that beneficial uses of<br />

groundwater are preserved. WAC 173-218 establishes requirements for injection of fluids to the<br />

ground through wells.<br />

J.4.1 Full Removal and Disposal Alternative (Alternative 1)<br />

Wastewater management standards may apply to contaminated wastewaters generated as a result<br />

of decontamination activities under the full removal and disposal alternative. Potentially<br />

contaminated may be discharged to the ground or may<br />

need to be collected and taken to the 200 Area's Liquid Effluent Retention Facility for treatment<br />

at the Effluent Treatment Facility. If any surface contamination removal work is identified for<br />

structures or waste, carbon dioxide blasting or scarifying will be used for its removal instead of<br />

water. No wastewater would be discharged to an injection well under this alternative.<br />

J.4.2 Containment Alternatives (Alternatives 3, 4, and 6)<br />

Decontamination wastewaters will be managed as described for Alternative 1. Stormwater<br />

runoff may require collection in some type of percolation/evaporation basin during operation,<br />

closure, and post-closure of the 221-U Facility under any of these alternatives if contaminated.<br />

Uncontaminated stormwater will not be rcouire collection and will he discharged to the ground<br />

The percolation/evaporation basin would be expected to meet standards for waste discharges<br />

from stormwater runoff. All known available and reasonable technologies will be implemented<br />

in the form of stormwater runon/runotl'management controls. For example, the barrier final<br />

design needs to address limiting runoff erosion of the barrier and capture of the runoff in some<br />

type of percolation/evaporation basin. No wastewater would be discharged to an injection well<br />

under this alternative.<br />

J-5 STANDARDS FOR PROTECTION OF THE COLUMBIA RIVER<br />

FROM DIRECT DISCHARGES<br />

The National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) authority, codified in 40 CFR<br />

122, addresses technology-based limitations and standards, control of toxic pollutants, and<br />

monitoring for direct discharges to waters of the United States, including stormwater. Public<br />

Final Fearlbiliry Stvr*for the Canyon Disposition lnftfatlve (111-UFacl/ity)<br />

Fa1taxil>ar31W tSeptember 2002 1-6<br />

.^

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!