View Document Here - Hanford Site
View Document Here - Hanford Site
View Document Here - Hanford Site
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Appendix D-- Slope Stability Analysis for DOEtRt,-2001-11<br />
Environmental Cap Rev.p t Drafi g<br />
Redlinc/Strikcou<br />
1<br />
2<br />
3<br />
4. The effects of soil-structure interaction for the building and adjacent fill materials should be<br />
consideted Analyses should be performed to evaluate the effects of potential differential<br />
4<br />
5<br />
6<br />
response to seismic ground motions between the fairly rigid 221-U Facility concrete structure<br />
and the comparatively flexible filI materials placed around the exterior of the facility.<br />
7 5. Final design should also pursue the technological challenge of attempting to design a barrier<br />
8 that will providc containment to the 221-U Facility and to adjacent waste sites while<br />
9<br />
10<br />
11<br />
maintaining the barrier footprint developed in this FS for Alternatives 3, 4, and 6.<br />
12<br />
13<br />
D.6 REFERENCES<br />
14 Baxter,l. T., 2000, 221-U Conceptual Structural Study (CSS)forthe Canyon Disposition<br />
15<br />
16<br />
lnitiative (CDI), HNF-6325, Rev. 0, Fluor <strong>Hanford</strong>, Inc., Richland, Washington.<br />
17 Casbon, M. A.,1995, Design Analysis, Construction ofW296 Environmental Restoration<br />
18 Disposal Facility, BHI-00355, Rev. 00, Vol. 1, Bechtel <strong>Hanford</strong>, Inc., Richland,<br />
19<br />
^20<br />
Washington.<br />
( ?1 CH2M HILJ., 2001, Engineering Design File, Draft Slope Stability Assessments, INEEL,<br />
22<br />
23<br />
EDF-ER-268, CH2M HILL, Idaho Falls, Idaho.<br />
24 DOE 0 5480.28, Natural Phenomenon llazards Mitigation, U.S. Department of Energy,<br />
25<br />
26<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
27<br />
28<br />
DOE 0 6430.IA, General Design Criteria, U.S. Department of Energy, Washington, D.C.<br />
29 DOE, 1996, Natural Phenomena Hatards Design and Evaluation Criteria for Department of<br />
30<br />
31<br />
32<br />
Energy Facilities, DOE-STD-1020-94, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy,<br />
Washington, D.C.<br />
33<br />
34<br />
35<br />
36<br />
DOE-RL,1996, Focused Feasibility Study ofEngineered Barriers for Waste Management Units<br />
in the 200 Areas, DOEIRL-93-33, Rev. 1, U.S. Department of Energy. Richland<br />
Operations Office, Richland, Washington.<br />
37 DOE-RL, 1998. Phase I Feasibility Study for the Canyon Disposition Initiative (221-U Facility),<br />
38<br />
39<br />
40<br />
DOE//Rllr97-11, Rev.1, U.S. Department of Energy, Richland Operations Office,<br />
Richland, Washington.<br />
41 Druschel, S. J. and E. R. Underwood, 1993, "Design of Irning and Cover System Sideslopes:'<br />
42 accepted for publication and presentation, Geosyntlietics '93 Conference, Industrial<br />
('43<br />
44<br />
Fabrics Association International, Vancouver, B.C.<br />
Final Feasibility Surdyfor the Canyon DisposiNon laitiative (221-U Faciliry)<br />
'1 003 D-9