Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat
Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat
Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
6<br />
Employee <strong>Participation</strong> <strong>in</strong><br />
Enterprise Control and Returns:<br />
Patterns, Gaps and Discont<strong>in</strong>uities*<br />
Mario Domenico Nuti<br />
6.1 Introduction<br />
This paper reviews and attacks the standard classification <strong>of</strong> enterprise<br />
types by degree <strong>of</strong> employee participation <strong>in</strong> enterprise returns and<br />
control rights, an approach exemplified by the work <strong>of</strong> Ben-Ner and<br />
Jones (1995). This is conceptualized as a cont<strong>in</strong>uous spectrum <strong>of</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ations<br />
<strong>of</strong> different degrees <strong>of</strong> the two forms <strong>of</strong> participation, with<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous though non monotonic effects on productivity.<br />
An alternative approach is developed <strong>in</strong> which, unlike that <strong>of</strong><br />
Ben-Ner’s and Jones’s:<br />
1 Returns may <strong>in</strong>clude not only net pr<strong>of</strong>its but also the net <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong><br />
enterprise capital value.<br />
2 Control is divided between <strong>in</strong>dustrial democracy and entrepreneurial<br />
control.<br />
3 Employees’ dom<strong>in</strong>ant entrepreneurial control is split <strong>in</strong>to two radically<br />
different cases accord<strong>in</strong>g to whether control is exercised by<br />
employees <strong>in</strong>dividually hold<strong>in</strong>g a smaller share <strong>of</strong> equity than <strong>of</strong><br />
* This paper orig<strong>in</strong>ated <strong>in</strong> a discussion on employee ownership at an ILO sem<strong>in</strong>ar<br />
held <strong>in</strong> Budapest <strong>in</strong> February 1997. I owe much to the sem<strong>in</strong>ar participants<br />
and <strong>in</strong> particular Felix FitzRoy, Derek Jones, Mark Kl<strong>in</strong>ed<strong>in</strong>st, George Lajtai,<br />
Niels Myg<strong>in</strong>d, Charles Rock, Milica Uvalić, Daniel Vaughan-Whitehead –<br />
though many <strong>of</strong> them should be credited with views different, sometimes opposite,<br />
to those expressed here. While my views on employee participation, over<br />
time, have diverged from those <strong>of</strong> <strong>Branko</strong> <strong>Horvat</strong> (as exemplified, for <strong>in</strong>stance,<br />
<strong>in</strong> <strong>Horvat</strong>, 1982) and other staunch supporters <strong>of</strong> self-managed and workerowned<br />
enterprises, I still share <strong>Branko</strong>’s values and I regard him as an important<br />
<strong>in</strong>tellectual stimulus and source <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>spiration. I therefore hope that he will<br />
accept this somewhat heretical text as a token <strong>of</strong> esteem and affection.<br />
91