Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat
Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat
Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
106 Employee Involvement and the Modern Firm<br />
major changes, which deeply <strong>in</strong>fluenced management science, are<br />
described below.<br />
First, there is a revival <strong>of</strong> entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship has<br />
become accepted as one <strong>of</strong> the central forces <strong>of</strong> economic growth. The<br />
entrepreneurial firms are def<strong>in</strong>ed by two elements. First, they pursue<br />
cont<strong>in</strong>uous improvement <strong>in</strong> methods, products and processes. And<br />
second, they are firms <strong>in</strong> which entrepreneurial activity is transformed<br />
from its traditional <strong>in</strong>dividualist activity <strong>in</strong>to collective activity<br />
(Best, 1990).<br />
Economists have noticed this change towards entrepreneurship, and<br />
the promotion <strong>of</strong> new firm formation became an important part <strong>of</strong> proposed<br />
policies as it is still with<strong>in</strong> the economists’ conceptual framework.<br />
However, most <strong>of</strong> the new literature on entrepreneurship is com<strong>in</strong>g from<br />
the field <strong>of</strong> management (Drucker, 1985, 1991; Stevenson, Roberts and<br />
Grousbeck, 1985; Timmons, 1990), an area unfamiliar to most economists.<br />
There is now a vast literature on entrepreneurship and there are<br />
about 20 pr<strong>of</strong>essional journals specializ<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> this field. The entrepreneurship<br />
bibliography currently conta<strong>in</strong>s over 30 000 entries.<br />
The second major change was the replacement <strong>of</strong> hierarchical management<br />
models by models with different degrees <strong>of</strong> decentralization<br />
<strong>of</strong> management decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g (Nadler, 1977; Peters and Waterman,<br />
1982; Walton, 1987; Sengenberger and Loveman, 1987; Cole, 1989;<br />
Kanter, 1989; Kochan and Useem, 1992; Hamel and Prahalad, 1994;<br />
Nonaka and Takeuchi, 1995).<br />
Economists have largely ignored changes concern<strong>in</strong>g company management<br />
because those changes fell outside the economists’ conceptual<br />
framework. In our view, the key changes have actually occurred <strong>in</strong> this<br />
sphere. This change <strong>in</strong> the management paradigm was triggered <strong>of</strong>f by<br />
the quality movement (cont<strong>in</strong>uous changes <strong>in</strong> product, processes, and<br />
be<strong>in</strong>g first on the market). It was started by W. Edwards Dem<strong>in</strong>g and<br />
Joseph M. Juran <strong>in</strong> Japan. The movement then spread to the US and is<br />
now rapidly proliferat<strong>in</strong>g throughout the world (Dem<strong>in</strong>g, 1982). A small<br />
group <strong>of</strong> economists work<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the area <strong>of</strong> Industrial Organization<br />
followed this development and have identified these major changes <strong>in</strong><br />
global competitive conditions. Their work has become known through<br />
Michael Best’s writ<strong>in</strong>gs as the ‘new competition’ (Best, 1990; see for<br />
example also Lazonick, 1991; Piore and Sable, 1984; Porter, 1990).<br />
The policy advice developed from these ideas encouraged the government<br />
to speed up the dissem<strong>in</strong>ation <strong>of</strong> knowledge on how to adapt<br />
to the new competition through <strong>in</strong>troduction <strong>of</strong> new pr<strong>in</strong>ciples that<br />
<strong>in</strong>clude focus on quality, focus on customers, cont<strong>in</strong>uous improvement,