01.06.2013 Views

Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat

Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat

Equality, Participation, Transition: Essays in Honour of Branko Horvat

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

xxx Introduction<br />

discipl<strong>in</strong>es such as management, political science, or sociology, and<br />

therefore po<strong>in</strong>t to some possible applications. Throughout the paper,<br />

lessons are drawn from the experience with self-management <strong>in</strong> both<br />

former Yugoslavia and Slovenia.<br />

The last group <strong>of</strong> papers (Chapters 8–11) addresses systemic change,<br />

whether <strong>in</strong> past attempts <strong>of</strong> fundamental economic reform or the most<br />

recent historical example, namely the 1990s transition to a market<br />

economy <strong>in</strong> Central and South Eastern Europe. The first <strong>of</strong> these papers,<br />

by Jozae Menc<strong>in</strong>ger (Chapter 8), discusses the emergence and disappearance<br />

<strong>of</strong> both market socialism and Yugoslavia. He analyzes <strong>in</strong> detail<br />

the various economic reforms undertaken <strong>in</strong> Yugoslavia from the 1950s<br />

onwards, evaluat<strong>in</strong>g their scope, nature and limitations. Menc<strong>in</strong>ger also<br />

discusses Yugoslavia’s economic performance, and po<strong>in</strong>ts to the key<br />

factors and ma<strong>in</strong> developments which led to the collapse <strong>of</strong> the country<br />

<strong>in</strong> the early 1990s. The numerous attempts <strong>of</strong> systemic change <strong>in</strong><br />

Yugoslavia rema<strong>in</strong>ed half-hearted, primarily because they failed to<br />

delimit political from economic power.<br />

Saul Estr<strong>in</strong> (Chapter 9) focuses on self-management and employee<br />

ownership <strong>in</strong> transition economies. The 1990s economic reforms and<br />

the transition from plan to market have created unprecedented opportunities<br />

for the development <strong>of</strong> a significant employee owned sector,<br />

primarily through the privatization <strong>of</strong> state-owned enterprises us<strong>in</strong>g<br />

the method <strong>of</strong> sale, or free distribution <strong>of</strong> shares, to employed workers.<br />

In this context, Estr<strong>in</strong> tries to evaluate the opportunities for labourmanagement<br />

<strong>in</strong> transition economies, and discusses what the most<br />

appropriate policies for employee owned firms would be, particularly<br />

<strong>in</strong> areas such as <strong>in</strong>vestment, <strong>in</strong>centives and productivity, and enterprise<br />

restructur<strong>in</strong>g. However, <strong>in</strong> spite <strong>of</strong> the diffusion <strong>of</strong> employee ownership<br />

<strong>in</strong> many transition economies, labour-management has not, for<br />

a number <strong>of</strong> reasons, emerged as a significant form. The most serious<br />

problems that arise <strong>in</strong> cases <strong>of</strong> substantial employee ownership are also<br />

discussed.<br />

Derek Jones and Niels Myg<strong>in</strong>d (Chapter 10) present privatization<br />

results <strong>in</strong> Estonia. The paper provides fresh empirical evidence <strong>of</strong> the<br />

effects <strong>of</strong> different forms <strong>of</strong> private ownership upon economic performance,<br />

based on a new and large panel, representative <strong>of</strong> the whole<br />

economy. Models which worked well for the Visegrad countries, surpris<strong>in</strong>gly,<br />

had low overall explanatory power <strong>in</strong> Estonia, consistent<br />

with the hypothesis that the key factor <strong>in</strong>fluenc<strong>in</strong>g performance may<br />

not necessarily be ownership (be<strong>in</strong>g thus <strong>in</strong> l<strong>in</strong>e with <strong>Horvat</strong>’s views).<br />

Part <strong>of</strong> the results give mild support for the view that some attention

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!