02.06.2013 Views

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Occupational and environmental exposures that could dysregulate the female endocrine pattern are<br />

a major topic of current investigation. Dioxins, other polycyclic chlorinated compounds and organochlorine<br />

and organophosphate pesticides are all potential compounds of concern. As described in the<br />

Male Reproductive Toxicology section, the concern is that many of these compounds have some type<br />

of estrogenic or androgenic activity because they are able to replace the endogenous compounds in<br />

cellular interactions. The theoretical potential for such compounds to affect female reproductive<br />

function is clear. However, demonstrating such an effect is extraordinarily difficult, and there are still<br />

no convincing examples of endocrinologically active compounds causing reproductive impairment in<br />

women through typical occupational or environmental exposures.<br />

The endpoints that can generally be observed for women are menstrual interval, fertility as measured<br />

by time to pregnancy, and ability to carry a pregnancy to term. This last potential effect will be discussed<br />

in the Developmental Toxicology section. There are such extreme interpersonal differences in menstrual<br />

interval and regularity and so many established causes for missed or delayed menstruation that<br />

associating any variation with a particular chemical exposure is difficult. Many cultural and occupational<br />

factors are clearly relevant for affecting time to pregnancy, and difficulty achieving a pregnancy<br />

when desired may affect as much as 25 percent of couples in the United States at times. It is clear that<br />

this is not always due to female reproductive problems, but this “naturally” occurring background<br />

obscures potential toxicologically mediated effects.<br />

The high degree of interest in endocrine disruption as a potential mechanism for female reproductive<br />

toxicity is driving extensive investigations of this hypothesis. In the future it should become clearer<br />

whether environmental estrogens and other endocrinologically active compounds can actually reach<br />

levels at which they can produce a significant endocrine disruption and subsequent reproductive<br />

impairment. Currently, we are left with a potential mechanism for reproductive effects and candidate<br />

compounds that could act through this mechanism, but no clear demonstration of any of the candidates<br />

posing an actual risk through such a mechanism for humans following occupational or environmental<br />

exposures.<br />

The potential for exposure to chemicals that could alter endocrine processes and the need to use<br />

pharmacological agents known to cause reproductive toxicity opens up controversial occupational and<br />

societal issues about restricting women’s chemical exposure. What types of data or experimental results<br />

should be sufficient to indicate the need to control occupational exposures? When considering whether<br />

women should be excluded from certain jobs during certain segments of their reproductive lives,<br />

suddenly, the need to get beyond the uncertainties of extrapolating doses and mechanisms of toxicity<br />

from animal testing becomes crystal clear. The associated issues are as widely disparate as the economic<br />

impacts of possibly needing to move employees in and out of certain jobs or requiring specialized<br />

exposure control equipment to the potential for claims of discrimination, should women be excluded<br />

from opportunities on the basis of concerns they do not believe are relevant for them.<br />

Alternatively, when deciding a certain therapy is needed, what constitutes an adequate representation<br />

to the patient of the risks to herself or a developing fetus? Clearly, we cannot always discard<br />

effective treatments. The recent return of thalidomide, discussed below as the cause of one of the most<br />

notorious cases of human developmental toxicity, is a shining example. Thalidomide turns out to be a<br />

particularly effective treatment for patients suffering complications of leprosy or some complications<br />

of AIDS. It may further be an effective sedative for cancer patients and those suffering autoimmune<br />

diseases. These uses expand the patient population where reproductive effects are a possible concern.<br />

Effective patient education and carefully planned distribution policies may be relatively straightforward<br />

for thalidomide, where the toxic timing and dosage is established and the outcomes are readily<br />

documented, but what is the appropriate balance between protection and restrictiveness for other drugs?<br />

Female Reproduction Summary<br />

11.2 FEMALE REPRODUCTIVE <strong>TOXICOLOGY</strong> 223<br />

Compared to the male, there are relatively few female-specific reproductive toxicants that are not<br />

related to developmental toxicity (Table 11.2). (Developmental toxicants will be covered in the<br />

following section.) In part, this is due to the difficulties in analyzing oocyte production and determining

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!