02.06.2013 Views

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

542 CONTROLLING OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH HAZARDS<br />

exposures occur from both inhalation and dermal routes, and that industrial hygiene is a valuable tool<br />

in the risk assessment process.<br />

Herbicides are routinely applied by foresters as a management practice to maximize yields of crop<br />

species. Weed species that compete against the crop species for nutrients and space within the<br />

developing forest are eliminated by the application of herbicides.<br />

Toxicology studies in the laboratory were performed to describe the oral and dermal pharmacokinetics<br />

of the herbicide as well as to determine a skin absorption factor for the herbicide. Volunteers<br />

ingested known amounts of the herbicide in juice, and the portion of the total dose that was excreted<br />

in the urine was determined. The time it took to excrete the material was also noted, and half-lives<br />

were calculated. A correction factor to account for the uncollected herbicide was also calculated.<br />

Known quantities were applied to the skin of volunteers for 8 h, and then washed off. Their urine was<br />

collected for 3 days after exposure and analyzed to determine the total amount that was excreted in the<br />

urine. The correction factor was applied to the amounts found in the urine to determine the total amount<br />

absorbed.<br />

A variety of toxicological studies looking at various organs and biochemical pathways were also<br />

completed, and the most sensitive effect was competition with an organic acid excretion pathway. The<br />

no-observed-effect level (NOEL) was determined as 2.5 mg/kg per day.<br />

To assess the occupational risks associated with use of the herbicide, a field study was initiated to<br />

determine exposure and dose to the herbicide. The study was conducted at four different sites, and five<br />

or six workers were monitored for both inhalation and dermal exposure at each site. The workers also<br />

collected their urine for 5 days: the day before the survey, the day of the survey, and 3 days after the<br />

survey. The collected urine was analyzed for the herbicide, and the total dose was estimated.<br />

For application, workers mix the herbicide into backpacks which can be slightly pressurized by a<br />

hand pump. The herbicide mix is sprayed onto vegetation through a wand several feet long, or through<br />

a gunjet which looks like a small gun, releasing herbicide under pressure by squeezing the trigger. The<br />

spray pattern and size of the droplets is controlled by the tip inserted into the opening at the end of the<br />

applicator. When the herbicide is released, some of it remains airborne, causing some exposure by<br />

inhalation and deposition onto clothing and skin surfaces.<br />

While applying the herbicide, applicators must walk near and sometimes brush against the<br />

vegetation that has already been sprayed, exposing the skin. Since many of the herbicides are<br />

formulated to penetrate through the waxy surface of the leaves, they are lipid-soluble, and, therefore,<br />

can more easily penetrate the skin.<br />

Evaluation of the potential inhalation exposure was fairly routine for the herbicides. An air-sampling<br />

pump was worn by each worker for the duration of the mixing and application period, and the pump<br />

pulled ambient air from the worker’s breathing zone through two filters in series: a mechanical filter<br />

to collect the mist and a solid sorbent to collect vapors.<br />

Dermal exposure evaluation was not as straightforward, however. The workers wore patches on<br />

their clothing that were intended to absorb the herbicide they contacted. The patches were placed to<br />

represent various portions of the body. Some additional patches were worn under the clothing to<br />

determine the penetration through the clothing. In addition to the patches, hands were washed in a soap<br />

solution and rinsed with water. The soapy wash water was collected to determine dermal exposure to<br />

the hands.<br />

The amount of herbicide that actually penetrated the skin (the dermal dose) was estimated by<br />

• Adding the surface deposition on exposed body areas (DE), such as the face, hands, and<br />

neck, to the product of the deposition on clothed body surfaces (DC), such as the chest, arms,<br />

and legs, and the average clothing penetration (CP)<br />

• Multiplying this sum by the skin absorption factor (SAF), the fraction of material that<br />

impinged on the skin that was expected to penetrate the skin.<br />

Estimated dermal dose = [DE + (DC × CP)] × SAF

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!