02.06.2013 Views

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

488 EXAMPLE <strong>OF</strong> RISK ASSESSMENT APPLICATIONS<br />

TABLE 19.5 Arsenic Risk Assessment Example: Typical USEPA Reasonable<br />

Maximum Exposure Soil Exposure Parameters a<br />

Exposure Parameter Value Reference<br />

ABSgi 0.28 Freeman et al. (1995)<br />

ABSsk 0.001 USEPA (1995)<br />

AF 0.2 mg/cm 2<br />

USEPA (1997)<br />

ATnc<br />

8760 days (adult);<br />

2190 days (child)<br />

USEPA (1991)<br />

ATc 25,550 days USEPA (1991)<br />

BW 70 kg (adult);<br />

15 kg (child)<br />

USEPA (1991)<br />

CA 1.8 × 10 –7 mg/m 3<br />

Modeled air concentration<br />

CS 90 mg/kg Site-specific average arsenic<br />

concentration in soil<br />

ED 24 years (adult);<br />

6 years (child)<br />

USEPA (1991)<br />

EF 350 days/year USEPA (1991)<br />

IR 100 mg/day (adult)<br />

200 mg/day (child)<br />

USEPA (1991)<br />

SA 2900 (adult)<br />

1000 (child)<br />

USEPA (1997)<br />

VR 20 (adult)<br />

10 (child)<br />

USEPA (1997)<br />

a<br />

Note: USEPA typically assumes 80–100 percent bioavailability for arsenic in soil. Therefore, the<br />

USEPA default value for ABSgi is 0.8–1.<br />

The calculated HI is rounded to one significant figure. Because the HI does not exceed one,<br />

arsenic exposure would be unlikely to cause noncancer effects. However, even if the HI value<br />

slightly exceeded one, this is would be unlikely to be of significant health consequence. This is<br />

particularly the case since the oral RfD for arsenic is based on a no-observed-adverse-effect level<br />

(NOAEL) in humans of 8 × 10 –4 mg/kg⋅day. As stated by the USEPA, a case can be made for<br />

setting the oral RfD as high as the NOAEL. The USEPA adjusted the NOAEL downward using<br />

an uncertainty factor of 3 to account for uncertainty associated with an incomplete database<br />

regarding the noncarcinogenic effects of arsenic.<br />

Note that if calculated for the adult, the HI for exposure to arsenic in soil would be lower<br />

because a child is exposed to more soil than an adult when dose is calculated on the basis of body<br />

weight.<br />

TABLE 19.6 Arsenic Risk Assessment Example: Calculated Daily Exposure (in mg/kg) to Arsenic in<br />

Residential Soil<br />

Exposure Pathway ADI a<br />

Ingestion 3.22 × 10 –4<br />

Skin absorption *1.15 × 10 –6<br />

Inhalation 1.06 × 10 –7<br />

a Average daily intake.<br />

b Lifetime average daily intake.<br />

c Expressed as an absorbed dose rather than a daily intake.<br />

Child Resident Adult Resident<br />

LADI b<br />

2.76 × 10 –5<br />

*9.86 × 10 –8<br />

9.05 × 10 –9<br />

3.45 × 10 –5<br />

∗7.15 × 10 –7<br />

3.46 × 10 –8<br />

ADI LADI<br />

1.18 × 10 –5<br />

*2.45 × 10 –7<br />

1.19 × 10 –8

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!