02.06.2013 Views

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

492 EXAMPLE <strong>OF</strong> RISK ASSESSMENT APPLICATIONS<br />

TABLE 19.8 Summary of Rodent Inhalation Studies of Antimony Trioxide<br />

Species Exposure Animals with Lung Tumors Reference<br />

Rat (female;<br />

Fischer)<br />

Rat (male and<br />

female; Wistar)<br />

Rat (male and<br />

female; Fischer<br />

344)<br />

The Watt study is limited by the use of only one sex for carcinogenicity testing. In addition, the<br />

precision of dose measurements in this study has been questioned, suggesting that antimony trioxide<br />

exposures may have actually been higher than reported (Newton et al., 1994).<br />

Groth et al. (1986) treated male and female Wistar rats with 0 or 45 mg/m 3 (time-weighted average)<br />

antimony trioxide for 7 h/day, 5 days/week for 52 weeks followed by a 18–20 observation period before<br />

terminal sacrifice (71–73 weeks after initiation of the study). Groth et al. (1986) also reported<br />

significant fluctuations in the antimony exposure concentrations generated in the exposure chambers.<br />

During the latter 6 months of exposure, air concentrations occasionally exceeded the calculated<br />

time-weighted average concentration by 50–100 percent. Lung changes in treated rats included<br />

interstitial fibrosis, alveolar-wall hypertrophy and hyperplasia, and cuboidal and columnar cell<br />

metaplasia. These changes were more severe with increasing duration of exposure. The extent of<br />

interstitial fibrosis continued to progress even after exposure ceased. Overall, 27% of treated females<br />

(19/70) were observed with lung tumors. It is unusual that no tumors were observed in treated males.<br />

Interpretation of the results of the Groth et al. study is limited by the use of only one very high dose<br />

level, so no dose-response information can be derived from the study. Chronic tissue injury appears<br />

likely as the mechanism for the eventual neoplasms, yet no insight can be gained from this study<br />

regarding possible no-effect levels. Also, there is considerable uncertainty in the actual exposure levels<br />

experienced by the test animals. Taken together, there are significant limitations in relying on this study<br />

to extrapolate any potential human carcinogenic potential of antimony.<br />

Newton et al. reported the effects of subchronic and chronic inhalation toxicity of antimony trioxide<br />

in Fischer 344 rats. Male and female rats were exposed to air concentrations of 0, 0.06, 0.51 or 4.5<br />

TABLE 19.9 Toxicity of Antimony Trioxide versus Carcinogenicity Potentials for Carbon Black and<br />

Talcum Powder<br />

Exposure<br />

Test Material<br />

Duration<br />

(months)<br />

Rate<br />

(h/week)<br />

Exposure<br />

Period (h)<br />

Concentration<br />

(mg/m 3 Cumulative<br />

Exposure<br />

) [(mg/m 3 Tumor<br />

) (h)]<br />

Incidence<br />

(percent)<br />

Antimony trioxide a<br />

12 35 1820 38 69,160 27<br />

Carbon black 20 85 7395 6.0 44,370 25<br />

24 80 8400 2.5 21,000 11<br />

24 80 8400 6.5 54,600 67<br />

Talc a<br />

28 30 3660 6 21,960 0<br />

28 30 3660 18 65,880 54<br />

Source: Adapted from Hext (1994).<br />

a Female rats only.<br />

0, 1.6, 4.2 mg/m 3 6 h/day, 5<br />

days/week for 13 months; 1<br />

year postexposure observation<br />

45 mg/m 3 7 h/day, 5 days/week<br />

for 52 weeks; 20 weeks<br />

postexposure observation<br />

0, 0.06, 0.51, and 4.50 mg/m 3 6<br />

h/day, 5 days/week for 52<br />

weeks; 12-month<br />

postexposure observation<br />

0 mg/m 3 —0/13<br />

1.6 mg/m 3 —1/17<br />

4.2 mg/m 3 —14/18<br />

Male rats—no lung tumors;<br />

Female rats—19/70<br />

Male rats—no lung tumors;<br />

Female rats—no lung tumors<br />

Watt (1983)<br />

Groth et al. (1986)<br />

Newton et al. (1994)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!