PRINCIPLES OF TOXICOLOGY

REFERENCES AND SUGGESTED READING 477
Purchase, I. F. H., and P. Slovic, “ Quantitative risk assessment breeds fear,” Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 5(3), 445–453
(1999).
Sielken, R. L., R. S. Bretzlaff, and D. E. Stevenson, “Challenges to default assumptions stimulate comprehensive
realism as a new tier in quantitative cancer risk assessment,” Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 21, 270–280 (1995).
Swenberg, J. A., D. K. La, N. A. Scheller, and K. Y. Wu, “Dose–response relationships for carcinogens,” Toxicol.
Lett. 82, 751–756 (1995).
Travis, C. C., S. A. Richter, E. A. C. Crouch, R. Wilson, and E. D. Klema, “Cancer risk management. A review of
132 federal regulatory decisions,” Environ. Sci. Technol. 21(5) (1987).
Travis, C. C., and S. T. Hester, “Background exposure to chemicals: What is the risk?” Risk Anal. 10, 463–466
(1990).
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. I; Human
Health Evaluation Manual, Part A, Interim Final, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington,
DC, 1989.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Seminar Publication. Risk Assessment, Management
and Communication of Drinking Water Contamination, Office of Research and Development, USEPA, Washington,
DC, EPA/625/4-89/024, 1990.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), The Use of Benchmark Dose Approach in Health Risk
Assessment, Office of Research and Development, Risk Assessment Forum, Washington, D.C., EPA/630/R-
94/007, February, 1995.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Guidance Manual for the Integrated Exposure Uptake
Biokinetic Model for Lead in Children, OSWER #9285.7-15-1, Feb. 1994.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Proposed Guidelines for Carcinogen Risk Assessment,
Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC EPA/600/P-92/003C, 1996.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Guiding Principles for Monte Carlo Analysis,
EPA/630/R-97/001, March 1997.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Exposure Factors Handbook, Vol. I, General Factors,
Office of Research and Development, Washington, DC, 1997.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Guidelines for Ecological Risk Assessment, Risk
Assessment Forum, USEPA, Washington, DC, EPA/630/R-95/002F, Jan. 1998.
Vose, D., Quantitative Risk Analysis: A Guide to Monte Carlo Simulation Modelling, Wiley, New York, 1996.
Waddell, W. J., “Reality versus extrapolation: An academic perspective of cancer risk regulation,” Drug Metab.
Rev. 28(1–2), 181–195 (1996).
Wallace, L. A., “Comparison of risks from outdoor and indoor exposure to toxic chemicals,” Environ. Health Persp.
95, 7–13 (1991).
Wilson, R., “Risk/benefit for toxic chemicals,” Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 4, 37–383 (1980).
Yang, R. S. H., H. A. El-Masri, R. S. Thomas, A. A. Constan, and J. D. Tessari, “The application of physiologically
based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling for exploring risk assessment approaches of
chemical mixtures,” Toxicol. Lett. 79, 193–200 (1995).
Young, A. L., “ A White House perspective on risk assessment and risk communication,” Sci. Total Environ. 99(3),
223–229 (1990).