03.06.2013 Views

Registration Document 2005 - Total.com

Registration Document 2005 - Total.com

Registration Document 2005 - Total.com

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Grande Paroisse<br />

An explosion occurred at the Grande Paroisse industrial site in<br />

the city of Toulouse (France) on September 21, 2001. Grande<br />

Paroisse, a former subsidiary of Atofina which became a subsidiary<br />

of Elf Aquitaine Fertilisants on December 31, 2004 pursuant to the<br />

reorganization of the Chemicals segment, was principally engaged<br />

in the production and sale of agricultural fertilizers. The explosion,<br />

which involved a stockpile of ammonium nitrate pellets, destroyed<br />

a portion of the site and caused the death of 30 people and injured<br />

many others. In addition, a portion of Toulouse was significantly<br />

damaged.<br />

This plant has been closed and the site is being restored. Individual<br />

assistance packages have been offered to employees.<br />

On December 12, 2004, Grande Paroisse, TOTAL S.A., the greater<br />

agglomeration of Toulouse (CAGT), the Caisse des Dépôts et<br />

Consignations and its subsidiary ICADE signed a memorandum<br />

of understanding, under the supervision of the city of Toulouse,<br />

providing that after restoration of the site, Grande Paroisse would<br />

donate a portion of the site as a “green” zone to the CAGT and<br />

portion of the site as an industrial zone to ICADE. TOTAL S.A.<br />

guaranteed the obligations of Grande Paroisse and also granted a<br />

10 M€ endowment to the InNaBioSanté research foundation in the<br />

framework of the cancer research centre anticipated by the city for<br />

the site.<br />

Ongoing investigations have not yet determined the cause of the<br />

explosion but the hypothesis that the explosion was caused by<br />

Grande Paroisse through the accidental mixing of hundreds of kilos<br />

of a chlorine <strong>com</strong>pound at a storage site for amonium nitrate<br />

was discredited over the course of the investigation. Proceedings<br />

against ten of the eleven Grande Paroisse employees charged<br />

during the criminal investigation conducted by the Toulouse<br />

Regional Court (Tribunal de Grande Instance) were dismissed and<br />

this dismissal was upheld by the Appeals Court of Toulouse. This<br />

investigation is still examining possible causes, without yet having<br />

drawn conclusions.<br />

Pursuant to applicable French law, Grande Paroisse is presumed to<br />

bear sole responsibility for the explosion as long as the cause of the<br />

explosion remains unknown. While awaiting the conclusion of the<br />

investigation, Grande Paroisse has set up a <strong>com</strong>pensation system<br />

for victims. At this stage, the estimate for the <strong>com</strong>pensation of all<br />

claims and related expenses has been increased to 2.05 billion<br />

(1) New corporate name of Arkema as from April 18, 2006<br />

(2) New corporate name to be taken by the holding <strong>com</strong>pany of the Arkema group from April 18, 2006.<br />

Risk factors<br />

Legal risks<br />

TOTAL - <strong>Registration</strong> <strong>Document</strong> <strong>2005</strong><br />

4<br />

euros (<strong>com</strong>pared to 1.95 billion euros in 2004). This figure exceeds<br />

by 1.25 billion euros Grande Paroisse’s insurance coverage for<br />

legal liability (capped at 0.8 billion euros). The provision for potential<br />

liability and <strong>com</strong>plementary claims was increased by 100 M€ in<br />

<strong>2005</strong>, and as a result the total unused provision stands at 133 M€<br />

as of December 31, <strong>2005</strong>, <strong>com</strong>pared to a provision of 110 M€ as<br />

of December 31, 2004.<br />

Antitrust investigations<br />

1. Following investigations into some <strong>com</strong>mercial practices in the<br />

chemicals industry in the United States, Arkema and some other<br />

chemical subsidiaries of the Group are involved in several civil<br />

liability lawsuits in the United States and Canada for violations of<br />

antitrust laws. TOTAL S.A. has been named in certain of these suits<br />

as the parent <strong>com</strong>pany.<br />

In Europe, the European Commission <strong>com</strong>menced investigations<br />

in 2000, 2003 and 2004 into alleged anti<strong>com</strong>petitive practices<br />

involving certain products sold by Arkema France (1) or its<br />

subsidiaries. Under one of these investigations, in January <strong>2005</strong>,<br />

the European Commission fined Arkema France 13.5 M€ and jointly<br />

fined Arkema France and Elf Aquitaine 45 M€. Arkema France<br />

and Elf Aquitaine have appealed to the Court of First Instance of<br />

the European Union. The Commission notified Arkema France,<br />

TOTAL S.A. and Elf Aquitaine of <strong>com</strong>plaints concerning two other<br />

product lines in January and August <strong>2005</strong>, respectively. Arkema<br />

France has cooperated with the authorities in these procedures and<br />

investigations.<br />

No facts have been alleged that would implicate TOTAL S.A. or Elf<br />

Aquitaine in these practices.<br />

Although since 2001 an antitrust <strong>com</strong>pliance program for<br />

employees has been launched by Arkema, it cannot be excluded<br />

that further proceedings involving entities of the Arkema group<br />

(and TOTAL S.A. and Elf Aquitaine as well) would nonetheless be<br />

launched by relevant authorities.<br />

2. As part of the spin-off of the Arkema group from TOTAL,<br />

TOTAL S.A. or certain other Group <strong>com</strong>panies have given<br />

guarantees to Arkema (2) or its subsidiaries to cover the risks related<br />

to proceedings for anti<strong>com</strong>petitive practices that occurred prior to<br />

the spin-off.<br />

81

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!