Chapter 1, The Reptilian Spectacle - UWSpace - University of ...
Chapter 1, The Reptilian Spectacle - UWSpace - University of ...
Chapter 1, The Reptilian Spectacle - UWSpace - University of ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
other terrestrial vertebrate. <strong>The</strong> spectacle scale, being composed <strong>of</strong> keratin, has a higher refractive<br />
index (n ≥ 1.5) than that <strong>of</strong> underlying tissues (n = 1.36-1.375 if similar to the cornea) (Valentin 1879a,<br />
1879b), making it a thin lens. Sivak (1977) and Caprette (2005) calculated the power <strong>of</strong> the whole<br />
spectacle in several colubrids based on measurements <strong>of</strong> curvature and average refractive index <strong>of</strong> the<br />
whole spectacle and found the dioptric power <strong>of</strong> the spectacle to be relatively similar to the lens, in<br />
some cases slightly favouring the lens, in others the spectacle. A lens with such a high relative power<br />
results in a shorter focal length for the optical system, which in turn results in a lower f-number (i.e.<br />
greater retinal illumination) and lower image magnification, all other parameters being equal. This<br />
optical design is frequently seen in nocturnal (Roth et al. 2009) and aquatic or amphibious vertebrates<br />
(Sivak 1976; Northmore and Granda 1991; Brudenall et al. 2008; Walls 1942; Duke-Elder 1958). In<br />
comparison, the ratio <strong>of</strong> cornea:lens dioptric power in a diurnal iguana is approximately 3:1 (Sivak<br />
1977, calculated based on data from Citron and Pinto 1973), and that <strong>of</strong> a (mostly) diurnal primate,<br />
Homo sapiens, is 2:1. It would therefore appear that the relative flatness <strong>of</strong> the spectacle constrains the<br />
snake eye, even that <strong>of</strong> diurnal species, to a predominantly nocturnal or amphibious optical design.<br />
Gecko eyes do not share this unusual morphology, nor do those <strong>of</strong> other spectacled lacertilians with<br />
well developed eyes. Rather they recall the eyes <strong>of</strong> lidded squamates in possessing highly curved<br />
corneas with consequent longer focal lengths.<br />
<strong>The</strong> question <strong>of</strong> what anatomical characteristics allow the spectacle dermis to remain as<br />
transparent as possible with maximum transmittance <strong>of</strong> the visual wavelengths <strong>of</strong> light remains<br />
unanswered. It is conceivable (and likely) that the composition <strong>of</strong> the spectacle dermis is similar to that<br />
<strong>of</strong> the cornea, in which transparency is achieved by the orthogonal arrangement <strong>of</strong> collagen lamellae<br />
and by maintaining its hydration state within a narrow range (Maurice 1957; Cox et al. 1970; Freegard<br />
1997) through passive and active means (Candia 2004). And as with retinal blood vessels, the spectacle<br />
blood vessel walls are transparent (Mead 1976) such that when constricted they are nearly invisible<br />
and difficult to discern even with slit lamp microscopy (van Doorn, unpubl. obs.).<br />
<strong>The</strong> transparency <strong>of</strong> the spectacle scale on the other hand presents a novel problem, since most<br />
keratinous structures are translucent at best. <strong>The</strong> transparency <strong>of</strong> spectacle scales varies little with<br />
23