18.06.2013 Views

Chapter 1, The Reptilian Spectacle - UWSpace - University of ...

Chapter 1, The Reptilian Spectacle - UWSpace - University of ...

Chapter 1, The Reptilian Spectacle - UWSpace - University of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

snakes have no need <strong>of</strong> a spectacle as they do not all fit the theory’s requirement <strong>of</strong> nocturnal activity<br />

patterns and deserticolous habitat.<br />

In discussing the protective nature <strong>of</strong> the spectacle, one should obviously consider its<br />

mechanical properties. Unfortunately these properties have eluded rigourous and systematic inquiry<br />

but have nevertheless elicited anecdotes such as Walls’ and Johnson’s quotes above and the following<br />

anecdote <strong>of</strong> my own: While studying a marbled gecko (Gekko grossmanni), a nocturnal arboreal<br />

species, I lightly rubbed my hand quite by accident against its spectacle. Remarkably (and regretfully),<br />

this resulted in a deformation on the spectacle surface, resembling a tear, which was clearly observable<br />

with a slit lamp. Fortunately, the gecko’s damaged spectacle was improved after the following moult,<br />

and completely renewed after a second moult, the new stratum corneum showing nothing <strong>of</strong> the earlier<br />

blemish. As this indicates, the delicate gecko spectacle does not provide the same degree <strong>of</strong> robustness<br />

against ocular trauma as a snake’s. No such deformation ever occurred by rubbing or abrading their<br />

spectacles, which attests to their durability. This fragility <strong>of</strong> the gecko spectacle may draw suspicion to<br />

the belief that the spectacle evolved for the purpose <strong>of</strong> mechanical protection, but again it must be<br />

borne in mind that current incarnations imply nothing <strong>of</strong> the original function. And while an arboreal<br />

gecko’s habitat and lifestyle, nocturnal or not, may make it less likely to suffer insults to the eye than a<br />

snake that uses its head to push through anything in its path, and while it is equally endowed with the<br />

ability to regularly replace damaged spectacle scales, it nevertheless emphasizes the need to consider<br />

alternative theories <strong>of</strong> the function <strong>of</strong> spectacles.<br />

1.5.2 Minimization <strong>of</strong> Evaporative Water Loss<br />

Arnold (1973) proposed another such theory by suggesting that spectacles and windowed eyelids may<br />

minimize evaporative water loss from the cornea. According to Reichling (1957, cited in Arnold 1973),<br />

water loss from the tear layer could account for up to 20% <strong>of</strong> the water loss in Lacerta agilis, quite a<br />

high proportion considering this lizard has small eyes proportional to its body size. Evaporation from<br />

the surface <strong>of</strong> the eye would be <strong>of</strong> greater significance to smaller species with large eyes that are<br />

27

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!