Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London - University Library
Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London - University Library
Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London - University Library
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
LIKNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON. 29<br />
that <strong>the</strong> derelopment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural system proceeded more<br />
rapidly in France, where <strong>the</strong> Linuean system gained but little<br />
hold, than in Holland, Germany, or England, where it became<br />
firmly established. Linnaeus fully recognised this, and ascribed it<br />
to <strong>the</strong> greater facility <strong>of</strong>fered by artificial methods for <strong>the</strong> determination<br />
<strong>of</strong> plants. '• Some botanists," he says, " would ra<strong>the</strong>r read<br />
a book in which <strong>the</strong> plants are arranged alphabetically, than one<br />
in which <strong>the</strong>y are arranged according to <strong>the</strong>ir characters." " I<br />
almost believe," he adds, " that <strong>the</strong> mind <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> botanist is disposed<br />
towards some one system from <strong>the</strong> outset ; nence it is perhaps<br />
desirable that <strong>the</strong> beginner should be made acquainted with all<br />
<strong>the</strong> systems so that this stuff might be got rid <strong>of</strong> once for all "<br />
(' Classes Plantarum,' Praefatio).<br />
The sway, amounting almost to sovereignty, that Linnteus<br />
acquired in <strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> Natural History could not, however, have<br />
been due to his intellectual qualities alone. Great as <strong>the</strong>se were,<br />
<strong>the</strong>y would have failed to effect that Reformation <strong>of</strong> which I have<br />
spoken, had <strong>the</strong>y not been reinforced by a capacity for inspiring<br />
to enthusiasm all who came under his influence. That he possessed<br />
this crowning gift in a remarkable degi'ee is <strong>the</strong> only possible<br />
interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outburst <strong>of</strong> activity in Natural History that<br />
followed upon his teaching. Out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crowds <strong>of</strong> students who<br />
attended his lectures, many became teachers <strong>the</strong>mselves, and not a<br />
few travelled far and wide in <strong>the</strong> Old World and <strong>the</strong> New in<br />
quest <strong>of</strong> animals and plants. Nor was it exercised only on his<br />
pupils ; it affected <strong>the</strong> teaching, <strong>the</strong> botanical teaching at any rate,<br />
throughout Europe, <strong>the</strong> most distinguished contemporary botanists<br />
avowing <strong>the</strong>mselves his disciples.<br />
Such being <strong>the</strong> man and his work, it is not surprising— quite<br />
apart from <strong>the</strong> special circumstauces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case—that our <strong>Society</strong><br />
should have been called after his name. And we, <strong>the</strong> Fellows <strong>of</strong><br />
to-day, may well be proud, as were <strong>the</strong> Fellows <strong>of</strong> 1802, to be<br />
thus associated with so great a figure and so momentous an epoch<br />
in <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sciences that we cultivate.<br />
It is impossible to recall <strong>the</strong>se great days <strong>of</strong> old without being<br />
reminded <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great days within our own experience. If our<br />
<strong>Society</strong> is a living monument to <strong>the</strong> Reformation brought about by<br />
Linnaeus, it was also directly concerned in <strong>the</strong> Revolution wrought<br />
a century later by Darwin. This is not <strong>the</strong> time to draw a parallel<br />
between <strong>the</strong>se two great naturalists ; it will suflice to say that,<br />
however different in o<strong>the</strong>r respects, <strong>the</strong>y both laboured, and<br />
laboured triumphantly, to <strong>the</strong> limit <strong>of</strong> life and strength, in <strong>the</strong><br />
cause <strong>of</strong> Natural History, and both alike have <strong>the</strong> strongest claim<br />
upon our veneration and our gratitude.<br />
I have now exhausted my <strong>the</strong>me, and were this not an especially<br />
memorable occasion for me, I might well bring my address at<br />
once to a close. As it is, I cannot forbear a few words by way<br />
<strong>of</strong> epilogue. Once more I would express my pr<strong>of</strong>ound appreciation<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> confidence that raised me to this high and responsible<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice, and has maintained me <strong>the</strong>rein during all <strong>the</strong>se years.