20.06.2013 Views

Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London - University Library

Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London - University Library

Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London - University Library

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

LIKNEAN SOCIETY OF LONDON. 29<br />

that <strong>the</strong> derelopment <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> natural system proceeded more<br />

rapidly in France, where <strong>the</strong> Linuean system gained but little<br />

hold, than in Holland, Germany, or England, where it became<br />

firmly established. Linnaeus fully recognised this, and ascribed it<br />

to <strong>the</strong> greater facility <strong>of</strong>fered by artificial methods for <strong>the</strong> determination<br />

<strong>of</strong> plants. '• Some botanists," he says, " would ra<strong>the</strong>r read<br />

a book in which <strong>the</strong> plants are arranged alphabetically, than one<br />

in which <strong>the</strong>y are arranged according to <strong>the</strong>ir characters." " I<br />

almost believe," he adds, " that <strong>the</strong> mind <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> botanist is disposed<br />

towards some one system from <strong>the</strong> outset ; nence it is perhaps<br />

desirable that <strong>the</strong> beginner should be made acquainted with all<br />

<strong>the</strong> systems so that this stuff might be got rid <strong>of</strong> once for all "<br />

(' Classes Plantarum,' Praefatio).<br />

The sway, amounting almost to sovereignty, that Linnteus<br />

acquired in <strong>the</strong> realm <strong>of</strong> Natural History could not, however, have<br />

been due to his intellectual qualities alone. Great as <strong>the</strong>se were,<br />

<strong>the</strong>y would have failed to effect that Reformation <strong>of</strong> which I have<br />

spoken, had <strong>the</strong>y not been reinforced by a capacity for inspiring<br />

to enthusiasm all who came under his influence. That he possessed<br />

this crowning gift in a remarkable degi'ee is <strong>the</strong> only possible<br />

interpretation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> outburst <strong>of</strong> activity in Natural History that<br />

followed upon his teaching. Out <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> crowds <strong>of</strong> students who<br />

attended his lectures, many became teachers <strong>the</strong>mselves, and not a<br />

few travelled far and wide in <strong>the</strong> Old World and <strong>the</strong> New in<br />

quest <strong>of</strong> animals and plants. Nor was it exercised only on his<br />

pupils ; it affected <strong>the</strong> teaching, <strong>the</strong> botanical teaching at any rate,<br />

throughout Europe, <strong>the</strong> most distinguished contemporary botanists<br />

avowing <strong>the</strong>mselves his disciples.<br />

Such being <strong>the</strong> man and his work, it is not surprising— quite<br />

apart from <strong>the</strong> special circumstauces <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> case—that our <strong>Society</strong><br />

should have been called after his name. And we, <strong>the</strong> Fellows <strong>of</strong><br />

to-day, may well be proud, as were <strong>the</strong> Fellows <strong>of</strong> 1802, to be<br />

thus associated with so great a figure and so momentous an epoch<br />

in <strong>the</strong> history <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> sciences that we cultivate.<br />

It is impossible to recall <strong>the</strong>se great days <strong>of</strong> old without being<br />

reminded <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> great days within our own experience. If our<br />

<strong>Society</strong> is a living monument to <strong>the</strong> Reformation brought about by<br />

Linnaeus, it was also directly concerned in <strong>the</strong> Revolution wrought<br />

a century later by Darwin. This is not <strong>the</strong> time to draw a parallel<br />

between <strong>the</strong>se two great naturalists ; it will suflice to say that,<br />

however different in o<strong>the</strong>r respects, <strong>the</strong>y both laboured, and<br />

laboured triumphantly, to <strong>the</strong> limit <strong>of</strong> life and strength, in <strong>the</strong><br />

cause <strong>of</strong> Natural History, and both alike have <strong>the</strong> strongest claim<br />

upon our veneration and our gratitude.<br />

I have now exhausted my <strong>the</strong>me, and were this not an especially<br />

memorable occasion for me, I might well bring my address at<br />

once to a close. As it is, I cannot forbear a few words by way<br />

<strong>of</strong> epilogue. Once more I would express my pr<strong>of</strong>ound appreciation<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> confidence that raised me to this high and responsible<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, and has maintained me <strong>the</strong>rein during all <strong>the</strong>se years.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!