30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

What makes bad faith bad?<br />

If we perceive someone as a waiter, we know what to expect from him. We know they<br />

are going to perform certain actions. Their behaviour will be to a certain extent<br />

predictable in that we know the role that a waiter has. We therefore know how to<br />

engage with the waiter. The identity the waiter has and the role he plays helps us to<br />

make sense of that reality. “There is nothing there to surprise us” (Sartre, 1958, p. 82).<br />

I enter a café and wish to order a cup of coffee. I recognise the waiter instantly because<br />

he is carrying a small order book and wearing an apron. Immediately I know how to<br />

behave in this situation. I take a seat at the table and wait for the waiter to come to the<br />

table to take my order. Objectifying that person as a waiter has helped me make sense<br />

of my reality in the café environment. So what makes bad faith bad?<br />

Employing mechanisms to manage our subjective selves within our external reality is<br />

not bad per se. We do it all the time as part of our individual engagement with our<br />

objective and social worlds. Perceiving the waiter has helped me to make sense of my<br />

reality in the café rather than seeing him instead as John from Bay <strong>View</strong> with a cat and<br />

a sick elderly mother. But this mode of objectification is not bad. Indeed, it is a helpful<br />

tool which I employ to make sense of different situations.<br />

When I am working as a nurse I objectify myself in the same way that Sartre’s waiter<br />

objectifies himself. I employ this as a coping mechanism particularly in high stress<br />

situations intentionally to disengage my emotions so that I can deal practically and<br />

effectively with the circumstances at hand. For example, say a patient is exsanguinating<br />

from a bleeding vein in his oesophagus, I adopt my objective role as a nurse equipped<br />

with the skills to effectively manage the situation for the best patient outcome. If I had<br />

not objectified my role in that scenario and engaged purely on a subjective level, the<br />

full horror of the situation would be debilitating to the extent that it would have<br />

negatively influenced my ability to function, less still to achieve a positive outcome.<br />

(Even now, in describing a situation which I regularly confronted in practice many<br />

years ago, I find myself using language which objectifies my behaviour in that context.)<br />

In each of these situations, employing a mechanism of objectification does not appear<br />

to be problematic. However, central to Sartre’s bad faith is that we use processes of<br />

103

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!