View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
longer calmer periods – which he called “normal science” (1996, p. 10). Since Kuhn<br />
developed the notion of paradigms, the concept has been more broadly defined.<br />
A set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a<br />
way of viewing reality for the community that shares them, especially in<br />
an intellectual discipline.<br />
dictionary.reference.com<br />
In science, a paradigm helps scientists to create avenues of inquiry, formulate<br />
questions, select methods with which to examine questions, define areas of relevance<br />
and to establish or create meaning (Kuhn, 1996, p. 10). So a societal paradigm exists at<br />
any given time and in an historical context within which enough of us value laws, rules<br />
and conventions sufficiently for the maintenance of stable social order. But what<br />
happens if the paradigm changes and enough of us cease to value the behavioural<br />
controls established and upheld by society’s institutions? And what might cause a<br />
paradigm change?<br />
Kuhn’s theory and Stage 2 of values-based law<br />
Stage two represents the destabilisation of the<br />
normal social rules and conventions which govern<br />
behaviours. As people value the rules less and<br />
less, the outer rings which were solid at stage one<br />
begin to lose their ability to constrain individuals’<br />
values. This may be in response to a change of<br />
environment, an event or a new world view.<br />
Figure 4. Stage 2 of Valuesbased<br />
law.<br />
Any number of factors may act as a catalyst for the destabilisation of stable social<br />
order. But crucially, it is not the event itself. The destabilisation occurs because of the<br />
altered way we view the world following the event. This paradigm change affects how<br />
we individually and collectively value the societal constraints on our behaviour.<br />
83