30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

nineteenth century, influenced by major scientific discoveries, such as Darwin’s theory<br />

of evolution (Hutcheon, 1972, p. 6).<br />

Value-free approaches to law and medicine<br />

This segmentation has repeatedly been attributed to the influence of Descartes<br />

(Loughlin, 1998). Loughlin (p. 26) explains that acceptance of value-free philosophies<br />

stems largely from the Cartesian conviction that the world to be studied is an objective,<br />

impersonal mechanism which we can only hope to understand by impartially viewing<br />

the “cold, hard facts”. Kennedy (1981) sees Descartes’ influence in the way modern<br />

medicine views the body as a machine and illness as a mechanical failure. Through this<br />

paradigm, the doctor approaches disease as a mechanic approaches an engine. This<br />

results in a reductionist approach to illness which isolates disease to the malfunction of<br />

a body part rather than seeing the person as a whole.<br />

The objective, scientific approach depicts man as an automaton, devoid of feelings,<br />

emotions, life experience and removed from his social or cultural environments. It<br />

influences not only the treatment of disease, but also the perception that medical<br />

decision making can be value-free.<br />

The medical science approach and the premise that value-free empirical knowledge is<br />

preferable remains highly influential in modern day health care systems. Evidence-<br />

based medicine takes it for granted that the scientific method is the governing method<br />

in advancing the field of medicine (Mayer, 2004). Evidence-based medicine urges<br />

health professionals to base their care on empirical studies, rather than simply on<br />

“opinion” (Meulen & Dickenson, 2002). Empirical methods in medicine have even<br />

spawned a new approach to bioethics called “evidence-based ethics” which claims to<br />

“delineate popular attitudes” relating to issues such as abortion, stem cell research and<br />

euthanasia (Goldenberg, 2005, p. 2). Evidence-based medicine may be a sensible<br />

approach to health care delivery, offering providers and consumers accountability and a<br />

firm knowledge base from which to plan treatment provision. However, purely<br />

evidence-based approaches promote the perception that medical decision making is<br />

16

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!