30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The philosophical problem<br />

Making a decision to withdraw or withhold treatment on behalf of another person is<br />

essentially a value judgement. Veatch explains the influence of values in best interest<br />

determinations.<br />

The value choices that go into a judgement about what is best for<br />

another are so complex and subtle…. unconscious value distortions will<br />

not only influence the clinician's judgement about what is best, but even<br />

influence the very interpretation of the scientific data.<br />

Veatch, 1995, p. 11<br />

Values are the expression of the subjective, human self. They stem from our<br />

experiences, our upbringing, the people around us, our education, our religions, our<br />

cultures, our societies and our emotions. Values are instrumental in guiding ongoing<br />

activities, resolving conflicts and making decisions (Rescher, 1982)<br />

There is a common misperception, however, which claims that personal value<br />

judgements can, and should be, removed from human reasoning and good science<br />

(Loughlin, 1998). This view is influential in medicine and law, resulting in the<br />

mistaken belief that objective value free reasoning is possible and even preferable. This<br />

results in a fundamental philosophical incongruity when best interest determinations are<br />

made using a combination of medical fact centred approaches and positivist legal<br />

process. Best interest determinations which raise complex ethical questions are reduced<br />

to medical facts and clinical judgement, and portrayed as objective and value-free.<br />

Consider the following case.<br />

Re Y [1997] (England)<br />

Y was a 25 year old woman who was severely mentally and physically handicapped.<br />

Y’s sister (the plaintiff) suffered from a bone marrow disorder. For a number of years,<br />

Y’s sister had undergone extensive chemotherapy. There had been a recent<br />

deterioration in her sister’s condition and there was a strong likelihood that her situation<br />

would progress to leukaemia in the next 3 months. The only realistic prospect of<br />

recovery for the plaintiff was a bone marrow transplant operation from a healthy<br />

4

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!