View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
painting. For Brentano, emotions directed toward an object in this way will be either<br />
correct or incorrect, and judgement that the painting is either beautiful or not beautiful<br />
cannot both be correct (Baumgartner & Pasquerella, 2004).<br />
If a value derives from an emotion or feeling, is it really possible that it can be<br />
described as correct or incorrect? Can one of the friends perspectives on the painting be<br />
right and the other wrong? The aesthetic evaluation of the painting is a subjective,<br />
evaluative judgement. The majority of people may agree with the first friend, achieving<br />
some consensus on whether the painting is beautiful, but this does not make the second<br />
friend wrong. It simply means he has made a different evaluation of the painting than<br />
others. Consider the feeling of sadness that may be invoked on a very happy occasion,<br />
such as a wedding or a christening. This feeling is not a matter for debate and even<br />
though it may seem inappropriate for the occasion, cannot be described as intrinsically<br />
right or wrong. The event may have sparked memories of a loved one who has died, or<br />
other unhappy memories. Emotion is an individual, subjective, human experience.<br />
Seedhouse (2005) also argues that value-judgements stem from human feelings: “I like<br />
this”, “I am drawn toward this”, “this makes me feel sick”, “I am afraid of this”, “I find<br />
this beautiful” (Seedhouse, 2005, p. xxiii). Seedhouse draws on the work of Antonio<br />
Damasio (1994) to establish the link between rationality and emotion.<br />
Damasio is a neurobiologist who, through examples of case studies, clinical experience<br />
and examination of the function of the human brain, has concluded that emotions,<br />
feelings and biological responses all play an indispensable role in human reasoning. As<br />
the title of his book, Descartes’ Error suggests, Damasio’s research refutes the view of<br />
rationality that human reasoning can take place independently from emotions and<br />
feelings.<br />
Feelings point us in the proper direction, take us to the appropriate<br />
place in a decision-making space, where we may put the instruments of<br />
logic to good use…. Emotion and feeling, along with the covert<br />
physiological machinery underlying them, assist us with the daunting<br />
task of predicting an uncertain future and planning our actions<br />
accordingly.<br />
Damasio, 1994, p. xiii<br />
26