30.06.2013 Views

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

View/Open - Scholarly Commons Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

denied there was any ethical component to this decision. Instead, the decision was<br />

described as a ‘clinically based’ and relied heavily on set guidelines and medical<br />

evidence. These denials epitomise the problems with best interest determinations made<br />

in medical and legal contexts – entrenched perceptions that they can be made without<br />

recourse to values.<br />

To challenge this perception, it is necessary to strip away centuries of positivist legal<br />

process and medical, fact centred approaches, and start with a basic understanding of<br />

how an ethically complex decision like withdrawing life sustaining treatment is made.<br />

Seedhouse’s rational fields theory offers a comprehensive and realistic theory of<br />

decision making. I use it as the basic theoretical framework with which to advance my<br />

argument.<br />

I start by considering perceptions about value-free decision making. I then set out the<br />

main points of the rational fields theory, following which I apply the model to best<br />

interest determinations. I finish by considering how the additional understanding and<br />

clarity provided resolves important philosophical questions and offers practical<br />

solutions to enhance decision making.<br />

Existing foundations<br />

Obviously evidence and values are intertwined. Obviously all decisions<br />

are a balance of evidence and values. Obviously we should regard our<br />

values as at least equally important as evidence. And yet we don’t.<br />

It isn’t particularly easy to understand why. We know we value. We<br />

know we are passionate creatures. And yet we want more and more<br />

evidence and less and less values in our decision-making.<br />

Seedhouse, 2005, p 23<br />

Best interest determinations take place within legal and medical contexts which are<br />

underpinned by philosophical frameworks which aim to achieve neutrality and<br />

eliminate the individual values of decision makers. The medical model is traditionally<br />

based on scientific method and essentially ‘fact-centred’. For example, the current push<br />

for evidence based medicine places perspective-free information such as ‘meta-analyses<br />

188

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!