01.07.2013 Views

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>report</strong>s 57 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation 103<br />

190%<br />

180%<br />

170%<br />

160%<br />

150%<br />

140%<br />

130%<br />

120%<br />

110%<br />

100%<br />

Figure 5.32: Trend analys<strong>is</strong> of the expenditures of the subsectors of<br />

Rehabilitation (%)<br />

2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />

Source: RIZIV/INAMI 2006<br />

%<br />

K-Nomenclature<br />

Convention 950<br />

Convention 771<br />

<strong>The</strong> expenditures evolution <strong>in</strong> percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts (2000 = 100 %) shows (Figure 5.32):<br />

• K nomenclature: a growth of 50% dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2000 – 2004 <strong>with</strong><br />

a slowdown <strong>in</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> the period 2001-2002.<br />

• Convention 9.50: a growth of 45 % dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2000 – 2004 <strong>with</strong><br />

a slow down <strong>in</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> the period 2003-2004<br />

• Convention 7.71: a growth of 83 % dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2000 – 2004 <strong>with</strong><br />

negative growth <strong>in</strong> the period 2002 – 2003.<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect of the new K-nomenclature <strong>in</strong> August 2004 and the new convention 9.50 <strong>in</strong><br />

July 2005 are analysed <strong>in</strong> the previous paragraphs.<br />

Explanatory factors for the <strong>in</strong>crease of the expenditures <strong>in</strong> the different subsectors<br />

might be the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade the length of stay (LoS) decreased significantly <strong>in</strong> the acute<br />

departments of the Belgian hospitals, due to the “PAL/NAL” system (a system <strong>in</strong> which<br />

a hospital <strong>is</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancially penalized if there are a “positive number of hospital<strong>is</strong>ation days”,<br />

as compared to the country’s average, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account differences <strong>in</strong> pathology<br />

between hospitals). Th<strong>is</strong> system was applied until July 2002. S<strong>in</strong>ce then, the system of<br />

“justified beds” has similar <strong>in</strong>centives. Patients are transferred to rehabilitation centres<br />

much sooner now. Th<strong>is</strong> had as a consequence that several acute beds were converted<br />

<strong>in</strong>to Sp-beds (cf. KB 12-06-2002). So the number of Sp-beds grew over the last years.<br />

For <strong>in</strong>stance, between 2002 and 2005 the number of neurological Sp beds <strong>in</strong>creased<br />

from 1203 to 1304 and of musculoskeletal Sp beds from 1582 to 1915.<br />

<strong>The</strong> number of departments PM&R grew the last decades and only few hospitals do not<br />

have a special<strong>is</strong>t <strong>in</strong> PM&R nowadays.<br />

Another hypothes<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> that due to ‘progress <strong>in</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e’, an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of very<br />

severely ill (e.g. critically ill patients stay<strong>in</strong>g several months <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive care) or severely<br />

d<strong>is</strong>abled patients (e.g. high tetraplegics dependent on artificial ventilation) survive. So,

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!