The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>report</strong>s 57 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation 103<br />
190%<br />
180%<br />
170%<br />
160%<br />
150%<br />
140%<br />
130%<br />
120%<br />
110%<br />
100%<br />
Figure 5.32: Trend analys<strong>is</strong> of the expenditures of the subsectors of<br />
Rehabilitation (%)<br />
2000 2001 2002 2003 2004<br />
Source: RIZIV/INAMI 2006<br />
%<br />
K-Nomenclature<br />
Convention 950<br />
Convention 771<br />
<strong>The</strong> expenditures evolution <strong>in</strong> percentage po<strong>in</strong>ts (2000 = 100 %) shows (Figure 5.32):<br />
• K nomenclature: a growth of 50% dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2000 – 2004 <strong>with</strong><br />
a slowdown <strong>in</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> the period 2001-2002.<br />
• Convention 9.50: a growth of 45 % dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2000 – 2004 <strong>with</strong><br />
a slow down <strong>in</strong> growth <strong>in</strong> the period 2003-2004<br />
• Convention 7.71: a growth of 83 % dur<strong>in</strong>g the period 2000 – 2004 <strong>with</strong><br />
negative growth <strong>in</strong> the period 2002 – 2003.<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect of the new K-nomenclature <strong>in</strong> August 2004 and the new convention 9.50 <strong>in</strong><br />
July 2005 are analysed <strong>in</strong> the previous paragraphs.<br />
Explanatory factors for the <strong>in</strong>crease of the expenditures <strong>in</strong> the different subsectors<br />
might be the follow<strong>in</strong>g:<br />
Dur<strong>in</strong>g the last decade the length of stay (LoS) decreased significantly <strong>in</strong> the acute<br />
departments of the Belgian hospitals, due to the “PAL/NAL” system (a system <strong>in</strong> which<br />
a hospital <strong>is</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ancially penalized if there are a “positive number of hospital<strong>is</strong>ation days”,<br />
as compared to the country’s average, tak<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>to account differences <strong>in</strong> pathology<br />
between hospitals). Th<strong>is</strong> system was applied until July 2002. S<strong>in</strong>ce then, the system of<br />
“justified beds” has similar <strong>in</strong>centives. Patients are transferred to rehabilitation centres<br />
much sooner now. Th<strong>is</strong> had as a consequence that several acute beds were converted<br />
<strong>in</strong>to Sp-beds (cf. KB 12-06-2002). So the number of Sp-beds grew over the last years.<br />
For <strong>in</strong>stance, between 2002 and 2005 the number of neurological Sp beds <strong>in</strong>creased<br />
from 1203 to 1304 and of musculoskeletal Sp beds from 1582 to 1915.<br />
<strong>The</strong> number of departments PM&R grew the last decades and only few hospitals do not<br />
have a special<strong>is</strong>t <strong>in</strong> PM&R nowadays.<br />
Another hypothes<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> that due to ‘progress <strong>in</strong> medic<strong>in</strong>e’, an <strong>in</strong>creas<strong>in</strong>g number of very<br />
severely ill (e.g. critically ill patients stay<strong>in</strong>g several months <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>tensive care) or severely<br />
d<strong>is</strong>abled patients (e.g. high tetraplegics dependent on artificial ventilation) survive. So,