The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

266 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation KCE reports 57 42. Williams GR. Incidence and characteristics of total stroke in the United States. BMC.Neurol. 2001;1:2. 43. Struijs JN, van Genugten ML, Evers SM, Ament AJ, Baan CA, van den Bos GA. Modeling the future burden of stroke in The Netherlands: impact of aging, smoking, and hypertension. Stroke. 2005;36(8):1648-55. 44. Ikebe T, Ozawa H, Lida M, Shimamoto T, Handa K, Komachi Y. Long-term prognosis after stroke: a community-based study in Japan. J.Epidemiol. 2001;11(1):8-15. 45. Bamford J, Sandercock P, Dennis M, Burn J, Warlow C. A prospective study of acute cerebrovascular disease in the community: the Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project- -1981-86. 2. Incidence, case fatality rates and overall outcome at one year of cerebral infarction, primary intracerebral and subarachnoid haemorrhage. 46. J.Neurol.Neurosurg.Psychiatry. 1990;53(1):16-22. Oever Rvd. Economic impact of hip fractures in the elderly. Folia Traumatologica Belgica. 2005. 47. Seagroatt V, Tan HS, Goldacre M, Bulstrode C, Nugent I, Gill L. Elective total hip replacement: incidence, emergency readmission rate, and postoperative mortality. BMJ. 1991;303(6815):1431-5. 48. Diels J. Totale heupprothese. Variatie in medische praktijk en lange termijnresultaten. 2006. 49. Ostendorf M, Johnell O, Malchau H, Dhert WJ, Schrijvers AJ, Verbout AJ. The epidemiology of total hip replacement in The Netherlands and Sweden: present status and future needs. Acta Orthop.Scand. 2002;73(3):282-6. 50. Dixon T, Shaw ME, Dieppe PA. Analysis of regional variation in hip and knee joint replacement rates in England using Hospital Episodes Statistics. Public Health. 2006;120(1):83-90. 51. Dixon T, Shaw M, Ebrahim S, Dieppe P. Trends in hip and knee joint replacement: socioeconomic inequalities and projections of need. Ann.Rheum.Dis. 2004;63(7):825-30. 52. Pedersen AB, Johnsen SP, Overgaard S, Soballe K, Sorensen HT, Lucht U. Total hip arthroplasty in Denmark: incidence of primary operations and revisions during 1996- 2002 and estimated future demands. Acta Orthop. 2005;76(2):182-9. 53. Kurtz S, Mowat F, Ong K, Chan N, Lau E, Halpern M. Prevalence of primary and revision total hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 1990 through 2002. J.Bone Joint Surg.Am. 2005;87(7):1487-97. 54. Frankel S, Eachus J, Pearson N, Greenwood R, Chan P, Peters TJ, et al. Population requirement for primary hip-replacement surgery: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 1999;353(9161):1304-9. 55. Moreau T, Manceau E, Lucas B, Lemesle M, Urbinelli R, Giroud M. Incidence of multiple sclerosis in Dijon, France: a population-based ascertainment. Neurol.Res. 56. 2000;22(2):156-9. Ford HL, Gerry E, Johnson M, Williams R. A prospective study of the incidence, prevalence and mortality of multiple sclerosis in Leeds. J.Neurol. 2002;249(3):260-5. 57. Murray S, Bashir K, Penrice G, Womersley SJ. Epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Glasgow. Scott.Med.J. 2004;49(3):100-4. 58. Koch-Henriksen N. The Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry: a 50-year follow-up. Mult.Scler. 1999;5(4):293-6. 59. Kobelt G, Pugliatti M. Cost of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Eur.J.Neurol. 2005;12 Suppl 1:63-7. 60. Pugliatti M, Rosati G, Carton H, Riise T, Drulovic J, Vecsei L, et al. The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in Europe. Eur.J.Neurol. 2006;13(7):700-22. 61. European Commission. Some elements on the situation of multiple sclerosis in the European Union. 2004.
KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation 267 62. Ooteghem Pv, Dhooghe M, Vlietinck R, Carton H. Prevalence of multiple sclerosis in Flanders, Belgium. Neuroepidemiology. 1994;13(5):220-5. 63. Hein T, Hopfenmuller W. Projection of the number of multiple sclerosis patients in Germany. Nervenarzt. 2000;71(4):288-94. 64. Haupts M. Overestimation of the number of multiple sclerosis patients in Germany. Nervenarzt. 2001;72(2):161. 65. Pernot HF, Winnubst GM, Cluitmans JJ, De Witte LP. Amputees in Limburg: incidence, morbidity and mortality, prosthetic supply, care utilisation and functional level after one year. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24(2):90-6. 66. Rommers GM, Vos LD, Groothoff JW, Schuiling CH, Eisma WH. Epidemiology of lower limb amputees in the north of The Netherlands: aetiology, discharge destination and prosthetic use. Prosthet Orthot Int. 1997;21(2):92-9. 67. Alaranta H, Alaranta R, Pohjolainen T, Karkkainen M. Lower limb amputees in Southern Finland. Prosthet.Orthot.Int. 1995;19(3):155-8. 68. Witso E, Ronningen H. Lower limb amputations: registration of all lower limb amputations performed at the University Hospital of Trondheim, Norway, 1994-1997. Prosthet.Orthot.Int. 2001;25(3):181-5. 69. Chen SY, Chie WC, Lan C, Lin MC, Lai JS, Lien IN. Rates and characteristics of lower limb amputations in Taiwan, 1997. Prosthet.Orthot.Int. 2002;26(1):7-14. 70. Eskelinen E, Lepantalo M, Hietala EM, Sell H, Kauppila L, Maenpaa I, et al. Lower limb amputations in Southern Finland in 2000 and trends up to 2001. 71. Eur.J.Vasc.Endovasc.Surg. 2004;27(2):193-200. Dormandy J, Heeck L, Vig S. Major amputations: clinical patterns and predictors. Semin.Vasc.Surg. 1999;12(2):154-61. 72. Melillo E, Nuti M, Bongiorni L, Golgini E, Balbarini A. Major and minor amputation rates and lower critical limb ischemia: the epidemiological data of western Tuscany. Ital.Heart J.Suppl. 2004;5(10):794-805. 73. Wrobel JS, Mayfield JA, Reiber GE. Geographic variation of lower-extremity major amputation in individuals with and without diabetes in the Medicare population. Diabetes Care. 2001;24(5):860-4. 74. Epidemiology of lower extremity amputation in centres in Europe, North Americaand East Asia. The Global Lower Extremity Amputation Study Group. Global Lower Extremity Amputation Study Group. Br J Surg. 2000;87(3):328-37. 75. Pagliacci MC, Celani MG, Spizzichino L, Zampolini M, Aito S, Citterio A, et al. Spinal cord lesion management in Italy: a 2-year survey. Spinal Cord. 2003;41(11):620-8. 76. Wyndaele M, Wyndaele JJ. Incidence, prevalence and epidemiology of spinal cord injury: what learns a worldwide literature survey? Spinal Cord. 2006;44(9):523-9. 77. Dryden D, Saunders L, Rowe B, May L, Yiannakoulias N, Svenson L, et al. The epidemiology of traumatic spinal cord injury in Alberta, Canada. Can.J.Neurol.Sci. 2003;30(2):113-21. 78. Martins F, Freitas F, Martins L, Dartigues JF, Barat M. Spinal cord injuries--epidemiology in Portugal's central region. Spinal Cord. 1998;36(8):574-8. 79. van Asbeck F, Post M, Pangalila R. An epidemiological description of spinal cord injuries in The Netherlands in 1994. Spinal Cord. 2000;38(7):420-4. 80. Koning W, Frowein RA. Incidence of spinal cord injury in the Federal Republic of Germany. Neurosurg.Rev. 1989;12 Suppl 1:562-6. 81. Sekhon L, Fehlings M. Epidemiology, demographics, and pathophysiology of acute spinal cord injury. Spine. 2001;26(24 Suppl):S2-12. 82. Kirshblum S. Clinical activities of the model spinal cord injury system. J Spinal Cord Med. . 2002;25(4):339-44.
Page 1 and 2:
Organisation et Financement de la R
Page 3 and 4:
Organisation et financement de la r
Page 5 and 6:
KCE Reports 57B Réadaptation locom
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
KCE reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230: KCE reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 249 and 250: KCE Reporst 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 275 and 276: KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 279: KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 291: KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 294 and 295: Dépôt légal : D/2007/10.273/19
Page 296: 35. Etude relative aux coûts poten
show all

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?