The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

More documents

Recommendations

Info

274 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation KCE reports 57 Prospective Payment System. RAND; 2005. Available from: http://www.rand.org/pubs/technical_reports/TR207/ 204. Report to the congress: medicare payment policy. Medpac; 2006. Available from: http://www.medpac.gov/publications/congressional_reports/Mar05_TOC.pdf 205. Hoenig H, Sloane R, Horner RD, Zolkewitz M, Reker D. Differences in rehabilitation services and outcomes among stroke patients cared for in veterans hospitals. Health Serv Res. 2001;35(6):1293-318. 206. Medpac. Post-acute care: A Data Book: Healthcare spending and the Medicare program. 2006. 207. Buntin MB, Garten AD, Paddock S, Saliba D, Totten M, Escarce JJ. How much is postacute care use affected by its availability? Health Serv Res. 2005;40(2):413-34. 208. Bates BE, Stineman MG. Outcome indicators for stroke: application of an algorithm treatment across the continuum of postacute rehabilitation services. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(11):1468-78. 209. Dobkin BH. Clinical practice. Rehabilitation after stroke. N Engl J Med. 210. 2005;352(16):1677-84. Davis H, Croft J, Malarcher A, Ayala C, Antoine T, Hyduck A, et al. Public Health and Aging: Hospitalizations for stroke among adults aged >65 years - United States, 2000. MMWR. 2003(52):586-9. 211. Liu K, Gage B, Harvell J, Stevenson D, Brennan N: U.S.Department of Health and Human Services; 1999. Medicare's post-acute care benefit: background, trends and issues to be faced. 212. Kane RL, Lin WC, Blewett LA. Geographic variation in the use of post-acute care. Health Serv Res. 2002;37(3):667-82. 213. Ottenbacher KJ, Smith PM, Illig SB, Linn RT, Ostir GV, Granger CV. Trends in length of stay, living setting, functional outcome, and mortality following medical rehabilitation. Jama. 2004;292(14):1687-95. 214. Stineman MG, Ross RN, Hamilton BB, Maislin G, Bates B, Granger CV, et al. Inpatient rehabilitation after stroke: a comparison of lengths of stay and outcomes in the Veterans Affairs and non-Veterans Affairs health care system. Med Care. 2001;39(2):123-37. 215. Deutsch A, Fiedler RC, Iwanenko W, Granger CV, Russell CF. The Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation report: patients discharged from subacute rehabilitation programs in 1999. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(9):703-11. 216. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Qualiy chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Institute of Medicine; 2001. 217. Schwamm LH, Pancioli A, Acker JE, 3rd, Goldstein LB, Zorowitz RD, Shephard TJ, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: recommendations from the American Stroke Association's Task Force on the Development of Stroke Systems. Stroke. 2005;36(3):690-703. 218. Schwamm LH, Pancioli A, Acker JE, 3rd, Goldstein LB, Zorowitz RD, Shephard TJ, et al. Recommendations for the establishment of stroke systems of care: recommendations from the American Stroke Association's Task Force on the Development of Stroke Systems. Circulation. 2005;111(8):1078-91. 219. Rymer MM. Organizing stroke systems of care. Stroke. 2005;36(7):1358-9; author reply 9. 220. Stuart M, Ryser C, Levitt A, Beer S, Kesselring J, Chard S, et al. Stroke rehabilitation in Switzerland versus the United States: a preliminary comparison. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2005;19(2):139-47. 221. Medpac. Section 4: Inpatient rehabilitation facility services. Report to the Congress: Medicare Payment Policy. 2006 March.
KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation 275 222. Lammertse DP, Jackson AB, Sipski ML. Research from the Model Spinal Cord Injury Systems: findings from the current 5-year grant cycle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1737-9. 223. Krause JS, Devivo MJ, Jackson AB. Health status, community integration, and economic risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(11):1764-73. 224. NSCISC. Annual Report for the Model Spinal Cord Injury Care Systems. Birmingham, Alabama: 2005. 225. Iwanenko W, Fiedler RC, Granger CV. Uniform Data System for Medical Rehabilitation: report of first admissions to subacute rehabilitation for 1995, 1996 and 1997. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;78(4):384-8. 226. Iwanenko W, Fiedler RC, Granger CV, Lee MK. The uniform data system for medical rehabilitation: report of first admissions to subacute rehabilitation for 1998. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80(1):56-61. 227. Forrest GP, Roque JM, Dawodu ST. Decreasing length of stay after total joint arthroplasty: effect on referrals to rehabilitation units. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80(2):192-4. 228. de Pablo P, Losina E, Phillips CB, Fossel AH, Mahomed N, Lingard EA, et al. Determinants of discharge destination following elective total hip replacement. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(6):1009-17. 229. Munin MC, Seligman K, Dew MA, Quear T, Skidmore ER, Gruen G, et al. Effect of rehabilitation site on functional recovery after hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86(3):367-72. 230. Walsh MB, Herbold J. Outcome after rehabilitation for total joint replacement at IRF and SNF: a case-controlled comparison. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;85(1):1-5. 231. Walker WC, Keyser-Marcus LA, Cifu DX, Chaudhri M. Inpatient interdisciplinary rehabilitation after total hip arthroplasty surgery: a comparison of revision and primary total hip arthroplasty. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(1):129-33. 232. Lin JJ, Kaplan RJ. Multivariate analysis of the factors affecting duration of acute inpatient rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;83(5):344- 52. 233. Vincent HK, Alfano AP, Lee L, Vincent KR. Sex and age effects on outcomes of total hip arthroplasty after inpatient rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(4):461-7. 234. Geyh S, Cieza A, Schouten J, Dickson H, Frommelt P, Omar Z, et al. ICF Core Sets for stroke. J.Rehabil.Med. 2004(44 Suppl):135-41. 235. Grill E, Ewert T, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Stucki G. ICF Core Sets development for the acute hospital and early post-acute rehabilitation facilities. Disabil.Rehabil. 2005;27(7-8):361-6. 236. Biering-Sorensen F, Scheuringer M, Baumberger M, Charlifue SW, Post MW, Montero F, et al. Developing core sets for persons with spinal cord injuries based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health as a way to specify functioning. Spinal Cord. 2006;44(9):541-6. 237. Rommers G. Clinical rehabilitation of the amputee: a retrospective study. Prosthet Othot Int. 1996;20:72-8. 238. Fortune N, Wen X. The Definition, incidence and prevalence of Acquired Brain Injury in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 1999. 239. Mason A, Tiemann O. Final Report: International comparison of costs: An exploration of within- and between-country variations for ten healthcare services in nine EU member states. HealthBASKET, European Commission’s 6th Framework programme. 2007;Deliverable 34, Phase III, Work Package 10 (WP10).
Page 1 and 2:
Organisation et Financement de la R
Page 3 and 4:
Organisation et financement de la r
Page 5 and 6:
KCE Reports 57B Réadaptation locom
Page 7 and 8:
Page 9 and 10:
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 17 and 18:
Page 19 and 20:
Page 21 and 22:
KCE reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 23 and 24:
Page 25 and 26:
Page 27 and 28:
Page 29 and 30:
Page 31 and 32:
Page 33 and 34:
Page 35 and 36:
Page 37 and 38:
Page 39 and 40:
Page 41 and 42:
Page 43 and 44:
Page 45 and 46:
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Page 59 and 60:
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Page 71 and 72:
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Page 103 and 104:
Page 105 and 106:
Page 107 and 108:
Page 109 and 110:
Page 111 and 112:
Page 113 and 114:
Page 115 and 116:
Page 117 and 118:
Page 119 and 120:
Page 121 and 122:
Page 123 and 124:
Page 125 and 126:
Page 127 and 128:
Page 129 and 130:
Page 131 and 132:
Page 133 and 134:
Page 135 and 136:
Page 137 and 138:
Page 139 and 140:
Page 141 and 142:
Page 143 and 144:
Page 145 and 146:
Page 147 and 148:
Page 149 and 150:
Page 151 and 152:
Page 153 and 154:
Page 155 and 156:
Page 157 and 158:
Page 159 and 160:
Page 161 and 162:
Page 163 and 164:
Page 165 and 166:
Page 167 and 168:
Page 169 and 170:
Page 171 and 172:
Page 173 and 174:
Page 175 and 176:
Page 177 and 178:
Page 179 and 180:
Page 181 and 182:
Page 183 and 184:
Page 185 and 186:
Page 187 and 188:
Page 189 and 190:
Page 191 and 192:
Page 193 and 194:
Page 195 and 196:
Page 197 and 198:
Page 199 and 200:
Page 201 and 202:
Page 203 and 204:
Page 205 and 206:
Page 207 and 208:
Page 209 and 210:
Page 211 and 212:
Page 213 and 214:
Page 215 and 216:
Page 217 and 218:
Page 219 and 220:
Page 221 and 222:
Page 223 and 224:
Page 225 and 226:
Page 227 and 228:
Page 229 and 230:
Page 231 and 232:
Page 233 and 234:
Page 235 and 236:
Page 237 and 238: KCE reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 249 and 250: KCE Reporst 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 275 and 276: KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 287: KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 291: KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Ne
Page 294 and 295: Dépôt légal : D/2007/10.273/19
Page 296: 35. Etude relative aux coûts poten
show all

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?