The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

268 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation KCE reports 57
83. Albert T, Ravaud JF. Rehabilitation of spinal cord injury in France: a nationwide
multicentre study of incidence and regional disparities. Spinal Cord. 2005;43(6):357-65.
84. Minaire P, Castanier M, Girard R, Berard E, Deidier C, Bourret J. Epidemiology of spinal
cord injury in the Rhone-Alpes Region, France, 1970-75. Paraplegia. 1978;16(1):76-87.
85. Burke D, Linden R, Zhang Y, Maiste A, Shields C. Incidence rates and populations at risk
for spinal cord injury: A regional study. Spinal Cord. 2001;39(5):274-8.
86. O'Connor P. Incidence and patterns of spinal cord injury in Australia. Accid.Anal.Prev.
2002;34(4):405-15.
87. O'Connor PJ. Trends in spinal cord injury. Accid.Anal.Prev. 2006;38(1):71-7.
88. Blumer CE, Quine S. Prevalence of spinal cord injury: an international comparison.
Neuroepidemiology. 1995;14(5):258-68.
89. Spinal Cord Injury. Facts and Figures at a Glance. 2005.
90. Haigh R, Tennant A, Biering-Sorensen F, Grimby G, Marincek C, Phillips S, et al. The use
of outcome measures in physical medicine and rehabilitation within Europe.
J.Rehabil.Med. 2001;33(6):273-8.
91. Douglas H, Swanson C, Gee T, Bellamy N. Outcome measurement in Australian
rehabilitation environments. J.Rehabil.Med. 2005;37(5):325-9.
92. van der Putten JJ, Hobart JC, Freeman JA, Thompson AJ. Measuring change in disability
after inpatient rehabilitation: comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and
the Functional Independence Measure. J.Neurol.Neurosurg.Psychiatry. 1999;66(4):480-4.
93. Houlden H, Edwards M, McNeil J, Greenwood R. Use of the Barthel Index and the
Functional Independence Measure during early inpatient rehabilitation after single
incident brain injury. Clin.Rehabil. 2006;20(2):153-9.
94. Butler C, Chambers H, Goldstein M, Harris S, Leach J, Campbell S, et al. Evaluating
research in developmental disabilities: a conceptual framework for reviewing treatment
outcomes. Dev.Med.Child Neurol. 1999;41(1):55-9.
95. Simeonsson RJ, Lollar D, Hollowell J, Adams M. Revision of the International
Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: developmental issues.
J.Clin.Epidemiol. 2000;53(2):113-24.
96. Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Ustun B, Stucki G. ICF linking rules: an
update based on lessons learned. J.Rehabil.Med. 2005;37(4):212-8.
97. Saitto C, Marino C, Fusco D, Arca M, Perucci CA. Toward a new payment system for
inpatient rehabilitation. Part I: Predicting resource consumption. Med.Care.
98.
2005;43(9):844-55.
DeJong G. Toward a more integrated Post-acute System of Rehabilitation Care. 2005.
99. CoPil, Jeanprêtre N. Nouveau financement B somatique. 2002 01//. Available from:
http://www.labelctr.ch/fichiers/RapportFinal_finB21.doc
100. Kramer A, Holthaus D. Uniform Patient Assessment for Post-Acute Care. Aurora,
Colorado, USA: Division of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado at
Denver and Health Sciences Center.; 2006. Available from:
101.
http://www.cms.hhs.gov/QualityInitiativesGenInfo/downloads/QualityPACExecutiveSum
maryReport.pdf
Putman K, De Wit L, Schupp W, Beyens H, Dejaeger E, De Weerdt W, et al. Inpatient
stroke rehabilitation: a comparative study of admission criteria to stroke rehabilitation
units in four European centres. 2006.
102. Harada N, Kominski G, Sofaer S. Development of a resource-based patient classification
scheme for rehabilitation. Inquiry. 1993;30(1):54-63.
103. Carpenter I, Perry M, Challis D, Hope K. Identification of registered nursing care of
residents in English nursing homesusing the Minimum Data Set Resident Assessment