The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

126 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation KCE reports 57
Figure 6.15: Treatment packages identified by payment systems in terms of
percentage of the complete rehabilitation process – Total Hip Replacement
100,00%
90,00%
80,00%
70,00%
60,00%
50,00%
40,00%
30,00%
20,00%
10,00%
0,00%
Key points
51a 52a 53a 54a 55a 56a 57a 58a 59a 59b
Total Hip Replacement
• Between the different respondents, there is a large difference in use of
mono- (M, K15 and K20) versus multidisciplinary treatment (K30, K60,
convention 9.50, convention 7.71). The contribution of the payment
systems differs accordingly.
• For all described patient cases, except for total hip replacement, every
single payment modality (M, K, convention 9.50, convention 7.71) seems to
be under consideration at least once during the rehabilitation process.
6.3.1.5 Reimbursement for each optional rehabilitation programme per patient case
Because the number of sessions and the used payment systems differ between
rehabilitation organisations a difference in reimbursement per optional rehabilitation
programme per patient case is expected. For the calculation of the reimbursement see
“Notifications” (see 6.3.1).
The next graph shows possible reimbursements of a rehabilitation programme for the
five patient cases.
On the X-axis the patient cases are classified by underlying pathology as well as the
optional rehabilitation programmes. On the Y-axis the reimbursement (Euro) is
represented.
M
K60
K30
K20
K15