The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
244 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation <strong>KCE</strong> Reports 57<br />
11.2.2.1 General rehabilitation services (simple rehabilitation needs)<br />
Because of the lower predictability of rehabilitation activities due to an expected high<br />
case-mix variability, a lump sum payment system <strong>is</strong> less convenient for general<br />
rehabilitation services. A lump sum payment would bear high (f<strong>in</strong>ancial) r<strong>is</strong>k on<br />
providers which could lead to a policy of r<strong>is</strong>k selection and attempts to redirect high<br />
cost patients to other <strong>in</strong>stitutions. On the other hand, it could be argued that an<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> scale (i.e. a sufficient or number of patients) reduces the variance and the<br />
r<strong>is</strong>k for the rehabilitation centres. However it <strong>is</strong> anyth<strong>in</strong>g but clear whether Belgian<br />
(general) rehabilitation centres have a sufficient scale <strong>in</strong> order to reduce the f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />
r<strong>is</strong>k from a lump sum payment adequately.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore the f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g mechan<strong>is</strong>m for general rehabilitation services (simple<br />
rehabilitation needs), could be fee for service, or a mixed system <strong>with</strong> relatively high<br />
weight of the FFS component. <strong>The</strong> service <strong>is</strong> a rehabilitation activity performed by one<br />
or more types of professionals <strong>in</strong> a mono- or (simple) multid<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>ary way.<br />
If only one professional <strong>is</strong> <strong>in</strong>volved (mono-d<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>ary rehabilitation, strictu sensu no<br />
rehabilitation (see chapter 1) s<strong>in</strong>ce only one d<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>e <strong>is</strong> <strong>in</strong>volved), a therapy specific fee<br />
<strong>is</strong> provided (e.g. physical therapy, occupational therapy, psychology, speech therapy...).<br />
If different types of professionals are <strong>in</strong>volved (multid<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>ary rehabilitation) two<br />
options are possible.<br />
• A first option <strong>is</strong> a common fee cover<strong>in</strong>g different d<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>es<br />
(multid<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>ary fee). <strong>The</strong> payment <strong>is</strong> made to the team and team<br />
members will have to barga<strong>in</strong> on the d<strong>is</strong>tribution.<br />
• A second option <strong>is</strong> a system <strong>in</strong> which every therapeutic (or medical)<br />
d<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>e gets a separate fee as mentioned for mono-d<strong>is</strong>cipl<strong>in</strong>ary<br />
rehabilitation.<br />
If all costs of the general rehabilitation services are supposed to be covered by the<br />
reimbursement system, the RIZIV/INAMI should keep about €49 million <strong>available</strong> for<br />
reimbursement of the general rehabilitation services. Th<strong>is</strong> <strong>is</strong> the difference between the<br />
extrapollated total costs of rehabilitation services as calculated <strong>in</strong> Figure 10.9 and the<br />
total costs associated <strong>with</strong> the 4 pathologies classified <strong>in</strong> the specific and highly specific<br />
level. In case of a budget neutral operation relative to 2004, about €28 million should be<br />
reserved for th<strong>is</strong> level.<br />
11.2.2.2 Specific and highly specific rehabilitation services (complex rehabilitation needs)<br />
S<strong>in</strong>ce the number of pathologies to be treated <strong>in</strong> specific and highly specific<br />
rehabilitation services <strong>is</strong> smaller and pathologies are relatively clearly def<strong>in</strong>ed, a lump<br />
sum or mixed payment system (<strong>with</strong> relatively high weight of the lump sum component)<br />
might be easier to implement and less contestable than <strong>in</strong> the general rehabilitation<br />
services.<br />
<strong>The</strong>refore, for highly specific rehabilitation services, the proposed f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g mechan<strong>is</strong>m<br />
could be based on a lump sum per treatment protocol. <strong>The</strong> lump sum can be paid by<br />
means of different units-of-payment ggg . Alternatively, a mixed system may be chosen<br />
<strong>with</strong> a relatively higher weight for the lump sum. In th<strong>is</strong> mixed system as well, the<br />
payment <strong>is</strong> done per treatment path, which boils down to a payment per capita <strong>with</strong> a<br />
fixed component (the lump sum) and a variable component.<br />
As the number of centres provid<strong>in</strong>g highly special<strong>is</strong>ed rehabilitation services will<br />
probably be very limited, an alternative f<strong>in</strong>anc<strong>in</strong>g system might be a fixed budget per<br />
rehabilitation centre. <strong>The</strong> amount of th<strong>is</strong> so-called “envelope” can be determ<strong>in</strong>ed by the<br />
case-mix of the centre. Aga<strong>in</strong>, a good PCS <strong>is</strong> <strong>in</strong>d<strong>is</strong>pensable to determ<strong>in</strong>e the case-mix.<br />
For the specific rehabilitation services, a mixed system <strong>with</strong> a relatively lower weight for<br />
the lump sum <strong>is</strong> an option, as th<strong>is</strong> level <strong>is</strong> character<strong>is</strong>ed by a somewhat larger number of<br />
pathologies and less complex rehabilitation needs than the highly specific level.<br />
ggg If the unit-of-payment <strong>is</strong> the activity then it becomes a fee-for-service