The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

KCE Reports 57 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation 269
104.
Instrument (MDS/RAI) and ResourceUtilisation Groups version III (RUG-III). Age
Ageing. 2003;32(3):279-85.
Lowthian P, Disler P, Ma S, Eagar K, Green J, de Graaff S. The Australian National Subacute
and Non-acute Patient Casemix Classification (AN-SNAP): its application and
value in a stroke rehabilitation programme. Clin Rehabil. 2000;14(5):532-7.
105. Averill R, Goldfiels N, Hughes J, Bonzelli J, McCullough E, Steinbeck B, et al. All patient
refined diagnosis related groups (APR-DRGs), Methodology Overview, Version 20.0. In:
Systems MHI, editor.; 2003.
106. Fetter R. Case mix definition by diagnosis-related groups. Medical Care.
1980;18(2):Suppl.
107. Fetter R. The New ICD-9-CM Diagnosis Related Groups Classification Scheme, Final
Report. . New Haven, USA: Health Systems Management Group, School of
Organization and Management, Yale University.; 1982.
108. Visca G, Fani M. Home care medicare prospective payment system and HHRg (Home
Health Resource Groups). Ann Ig. 2006;18(4):337-42.
109. Parkin D, Hutchinson A, Philips P, Coates J. A comparison of diagnosis related groups
and ambulatory visit groups in day-case surgery. Health Trends. 1993;25(2):41-4.
110. McNamee P, Parkin D, Allen D, Steen N, Hutchinson A. Measuring outpatient resource
use and case mix in ophthalmology in north east England. J Epidemiol Community
Health. 1998;52(4):247-52.
111. A report of the Canadian Institute for Health Information. Health, terminology,
classification and nomenclatures. 2006.
112. Goldfield N, Averill RF, Grant T, Gregg LW. The clinical development of an ambulatory
classification system: version 2.0 Ambulatory Patient Groups. J.Ambul.Care Manage.
1997;20(3):49-56.
113. Starfield B, Weiner J, Mumford L, Steinwachs D. Ambulatory care groups: a
categorization of diagnoses for research and management. Health Serv Res.
1991;26(1):53-74.
114. Parkerson GR, Jr., Michener JL, Yarnall KS, Hammond WE. Duke Case-Mix System
(DUMIX) for ambulatory health care. J.Clin.Epidemiol. 1997;50(12):1385-94.
115. Bello-Haas VD. A framework for rehabilitation of neurodegenerative diseases: Planning
care and maximizing quality of life. Neurology Report. 2002.
116. Eadie TL. The ICF: a proposed framework for comprehensive rehabilitation of
individuals who use alaryngeal speech. Am.J.Speech Lang Pathol. 2003;12(2):189-97.
117. Grill E, Stucki G, Scheuringer M, Melvin J. Validation of International Classification of
Functioning, Disability, and Health (ICF) Core Sets for early postacute rehabilitation
facilities: comparisons with three other functional measures. Am.J.Phys.Med.Rehabil.
2006;85(8):640-9.
118. Scheuringer M, Stucki G, Huber EO, Brach M, Schwarzkopf SR, Kostanjsek N, et al. ICF
Core Set for patients with musculoskeletal conditions in early post-acute rehabilitation
facilities. Disabil.Rehabil. 2005;27(7-8):405-10.
119. Williams B, Li Y, Fries B, Warren R. Predicting patient scores between the functional
independence measure and the minimum data set: development and performance of a
FIM-MDS "crosswalk". Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(1):48-54.
120. Morris J, Jones R, Fries B, Hirdes J. Convergent validity of minimum data set-based
performance quality indicators in postacute care settings.. Am J Med Qual.
2004;19(6):242-7.
121. Bryant L, Floersch N, Richard A, Schlenker R. Measuring healthcare outcomes to
improve quality of care across post--acute care provider settings. J Nurs Care Qual.
2004;19(4):368-76.