01.07.2013 Views

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>KCE</strong> <strong>report</strong>s 57 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation 37<br />

3.5.2.7 Programme de Médical<strong>is</strong>ation du Système d'Information – So<strong>in</strong>s de Suite et de<br />

Réadaptation 99<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>: PMSI-SSI has been developed <strong>in</strong> France <strong>in</strong> 1998. It not only <strong>in</strong>cludes post-acute<br />

rehabilitation, but also geriatric care, palliative care, alcoholabuse, and rehabilitation for<br />

children. Psychiatric care and long-term (“chronic”) care are excluded. It <strong>is</strong> based on<br />

medical diagnos<strong>is</strong> comb<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>with</strong> an assessment of functional impairment and a description<br />

of resource util<strong>is</strong>ation (time attributed to physiotherapy, speech therapy…). Evaluation of<br />

the patient has to be completed once every week (<strong>in</strong>stead of once per care ep<strong>is</strong>ode). <strong>The</strong><br />

system has been critic<strong>is</strong>ed on three po<strong>in</strong>ts: the large <strong>in</strong>clusion criteria which weakens its<br />

ability to predict costs per category, the large time <strong>in</strong>vestment (to be completed once<br />

every week); the fact that resource util<strong>is</strong>ation (and not only patient character<strong>is</strong>tics) <strong>is</strong><br />

taken <strong>in</strong>to account to develop case-mix groups.<br />

Outcome measure: Diagnos<strong>is</strong>, a measure for dependence and a measure for the util<strong>is</strong>ation<br />

of resources.<br />

Implementation: Fund<strong>in</strong>g of rehabilitation <strong>in</strong> France.<br />

3.5.2.8 TAR-FIM 99<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>: TAR-FIM was developed by a team <strong>in</strong> Switzerland specific for neurological<br />

rehabilitation.<br />

Oucome measure: Diagnos<strong>is</strong>, a measure for dependence and a measure for the<br />

consumption of resources.<br />

Implementation: TAR-FIM was subject of an experiment. It <strong>is</strong> not clear if it was<br />

implemented.<br />

3.5.3 Outpatient classifications<br />

3.5.3.1 Home Health Resource Groups<br />

98, 108<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>: <strong>The</strong> implementation of the prospective payment system for home health care <strong>in</strong><br />

October 2000 <strong>in</strong> the USA.<br />

Outcome measures: Outcome and Assessment Information Set (OASIS). OASIS <strong>is</strong><br />

developed by the Centre for Health Services Research at the University of Colorado <strong>in</strong><br />

the late 1980s and early to mid 1990s. <strong>The</strong> Oas<strong>is</strong> items were designed to measure, assess,<br />

and encourage improvement <strong>in</strong> care outcomes over time us<strong>in</strong>g Outcome-Based Quality<br />

Improvement processes.<br />

Implementation: With the implementation of the prospective payment system for home<br />

health care <strong>in</strong> October 2000, <strong>in</strong>formation collected via OASIS was used for case-mix<br />

adjustment <strong>in</strong> establ<strong>is</strong>h<strong>in</strong>g Medicare reimbursement. Overall, OASIS <strong>is</strong> used for outcome<br />

monitor<strong>in</strong>g, payment, and as a core but not comprehensive cl<strong>in</strong>ical assessment.<br />

3.5.3.2 Ambulatory V<strong>is</strong>it Groups 109-111<br />

Orig<strong>in</strong>: Ambulatory V<strong>is</strong>it Groups (AVGs) were developed <strong>in</strong> the 1980’s by the Health<br />

Systems research group at Yale University (USA).<br />

“Ambulatory care has particular problems <strong>in</strong> the construction of appropriate case-mix<br />

measures, and day-case surgery provides an opportunity to test two ex<strong>is</strong>t<strong>in</strong>g measures,<br />

one <strong>in</strong>patient (Diagnos<strong>is</strong> Related Groups) and one ambulatory (Ambulatory V<strong>is</strong>it Groups).<br />

<strong>The</strong>se group<strong>in</strong>g systems were applied to the same data to compare the case-mix patterns<br />

that they produce. <strong>The</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs show that Ambulatory V<strong>is</strong>it Groups appear to have<br />

advantages over the Diagnos<strong>is</strong> Related Groups <strong>with</strong> respect to their underly<strong>in</strong>g<br />

assumptions and labell<strong>in</strong>g of the groups; <strong>in</strong> particular, they assign greater weight to<br />

procedures. However, Diagnos<strong>is</strong> Related Groups are more developed, easier to use, more<br />

familiar and allow direct compar<strong>is</strong>ons <strong>with</strong> <strong>in</strong>patient care. Nevertheless, a proper<br />

evaluation of these <strong>is</strong>sues requires further data collection and analys<strong>is</strong>, together <strong>with</strong> a<br />

fundamental exam<strong>in</strong>ation of the uses of ambulatory case-mix.” 109

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!