The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
The report is available in English with a French summary - KCE
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
104 Musculoskeletal & Neurological Rehabilitation <strong>KCE</strong> <strong>report</strong>s 57<br />
even though prevention for road traffic and work<strong>in</strong>g accidents improves, the need for<br />
rehabilitation seems to <strong>in</strong>crease.<br />
Part of the growth <strong>in</strong> expenditures <strong>is</strong> due to <strong>in</strong>flation. However, compar<strong>in</strong>g the growth<br />
<strong>in</strong> the expenditures for rehabilitation to the overall growth <strong>in</strong> RIZIV/INAMI<br />
expenditures <strong>in</strong> Figure 5.28, it <strong>is</strong> clear that the growth <strong>in</strong> rehabilitation expenditures <strong>is</strong><br />
larger than the overall growth <strong>in</strong> RIZIV/INAMI expenditures.<br />
5.1.9.2 Relation between subsectors and <strong>in</strong>- versus outpatients<br />
An analys<strong>is</strong> of the treatments, given to <strong>in</strong>- and outpatients <strong>in</strong> the different systems<br />
(based on the RIZIV-INAMI data from 2000-2004) gives follow<strong>in</strong>g results:<br />
Figure 5.33: Overview of treatments for <strong>in</strong>- and outpatients (cumulative for<br />
years 2000 to 2004)<br />
Treatments Inpatient Outpatient<br />
K-nomenclature 3.303.654 63% 1.920.117 37%<br />
Convention 9.50 249.351 22% 897.667 78%<br />
Convention 7.71 312.134 62% 188.805 38%<br />
Source: RIZIV/INAMI 2006<br />
<strong>The</strong> proportion of treatment sessions, given to <strong>in</strong>patient / outpatient <strong>is</strong> different for all<br />
systems:<br />
• In the 9.50 convention the majority of the treatments focuses on<br />
outpatients<br />
• In K nomenclature and 7.71 convention the majority of the treatments<br />
focuses on <strong>in</strong>patients<br />
<strong>The</strong> fact that <strong>in</strong> the 9.50 population there are substantially more outpatients, might be<br />
expla<strong>in</strong>ed as follows:<br />
• <strong>The</strong> transport convention <strong>is</strong> mostly l<strong>in</strong>ked to the convention system<br />
(mostly 9.50).<br />
• It often happens that if a patient <strong>is</strong> a candidate for reimbursement of<br />
the expenditures for transport (only for wheelchair bound patients),<br />
he <strong>is</strong> “switched” from K to 9.50 when he <strong>is</strong> d<strong>is</strong>charged from hospital<br />
and start<strong>in</strong>g ambulatory rehabilitation. (Th<strong>is</strong> mechan<strong>is</strong>m <strong>is</strong> impossible<br />
s<strong>in</strong>ce the “new” 9.50 convention (cf. chapter 1.6), start<strong>in</strong>g August 1st<br />
2006.)<br />
• Some centres <strong>with</strong> a 7.71 convention also have a transport convention.<br />
As they usually deal <strong>with</strong> severely impaired patients <strong>in</strong> an early postacute<br />
phase, the majority of the patients <strong>is</strong> hospital<strong>is</strong>ed. In the<br />
ambulatory phase they can be referred to a regional 9.50 centre, closer<br />
to the patients home.<br />
• Some other 7.71 centres deal <strong>with</strong> chronic patients (mostly MS) and<br />
then thus often treat ambulatory patients<br />
5.1.9.3 Expenditures of the “transport convention”<br />
A specific expenditure that has to be added for the musculoskeletal and neurological<br />
rehabilitation sector <strong>is</strong> the expenditures of the “transport convention”. Th<strong>is</strong> allows<br />
wheelchair bound patients to travel <strong>with</strong> reimbursement between their home and the<br />
rehabilitation centre. Several centres <strong>with</strong> a convention 9.50/7.71 have th<strong>is</strong> transport<br />
agreement <strong>with</strong> RIZIV/INAMI.<br />
<strong>The</strong> total fees (Source: RIZIV/INAMI 2006) account for the follow<strong>in</strong>g cumulated (2000-<br />
2004) expenditures: