02.08.2013 Views

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7. COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS<br />

The sensitivity analysis revealed interesting aspects of the model and the systems<br />

under consideration, providing important insights about the contributions of each aircraft<br />

system. The cost effectiveness analysis can be used to provide more valuable information<br />

to support the DM. The only costs considered for this analysis were the estimated<br />

acquisition costs of one unit of the requested system. This is one limitation of the<br />

methodology, since no life-cycle costs are available at this phase of the process, which<br />

could provide more insights to the DM and a more detailed analysis.<br />

The approach consists of a graph where all the alternatives‘ utilities are compared<br />

against their cost. The objective is to present the results in a clear, concise and easy to<br />

understand way. 124<br />

In this example, the area of the graph is divided in four parts, where it is possible<br />

to classify the alternatives in terms of their cost effectiveness:<br />

1. Low Cost / High Utility<br />

2. High Cost / High Utility<br />

3. High Cost / Low Utility<br />

4. Low Cost / Low Utility<br />

124 David A. Fulk, Theodore P. Lewis, and Gloria Castro, ―Analysis Support for Acquisition: Part I:<br />

Analysis of Alternatives,‖ in Methods for Conducting Military Operational Analysis, ed. Andrew G.<br />

Loerch and Larry B. Rainey (Military Operations Research Society, 2007), 171.<br />

89

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!