[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7. COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS<br />
The sensitivity analysis revealed interesting aspects of the model and the systems<br />
under consideration, providing important insights about the contributions of each aircraft<br />
system. The cost effectiveness analysis can be used to provide more valuable information<br />
to support the DM. The only costs considered for this analysis were the estimated<br />
acquisition costs of one unit of the requested system. This is one limitation of the<br />
methodology, since no life-cycle costs are available at this phase of the process, which<br />
could provide more insights to the DM and a more detailed analysis.<br />
The approach consists of a graph where all the alternatives‘ utilities are compared<br />
against their cost. The objective is to present the results in a clear, concise and easy to<br />
understand way. 124<br />
In this example, the area of the graph is divided in four parts, where it is possible<br />
to classify the alternatives in terms of their cost effectiveness:<br />
1. Low Cost / High Utility<br />
2. High Cost / High Utility<br />
3. High Cost / Low Utility<br />
4. Low Cost / Low Utility<br />
124 David A. Fulk, Theodore P. Lewis, and Gloria Castro, ―Analysis Support for Acquisition: Part I:<br />
Analysis of Alternatives,‖ in Methods for Conducting Military Operational Analysis, ed. Andrew G.<br />
Loerch and Larry B. Rainey (Military Operations Research Society, 2007), 171.<br />
89