[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
that the objective should be kept in the hierarchy. A negative response was taken as a<br />
reason for exclusion. 95<br />
One important aspect is that the objectives hierarchy for a particular problem is<br />
not unique. Keeney and Raiffa argue that ―whether one arrangement is better than another<br />
is mainly a matter of the particular points the decision maker and the analyst wish to<br />
make.‖ 96<br />
4.3.1 Attributes<br />
Though the hierarchy described in the previous section represented an important<br />
achievement in the development of the qualitative part of the model, meaningful<br />
attributes to the lower level objectives still needed to be defined. This step was<br />
accomplished, based on personal expertise, research, and elicitations with experts. The<br />
goal was to identify the set composed of the most important attributes for each<br />
fundamental objective at the lower level of the hierarchy.<br />
Since the process of identifying attributes is ―basically creative in nature‖ 97 ,<br />
several attributes were generated for each objective using a brainstorming type of<br />
approach. Then, the list was refined taking the attributes desired properties in<br />
consideration. For example, the first assessment of the objective 1.1.1(maximize the<br />
95 Ibid.<br />
96 Ibid., 47.<br />
97 Ibid., 64.<br />
51