02.08.2013 Views

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

that the objective should be kept in the hierarchy. A negative response was taken as a<br />

reason for exclusion. 95<br />

One important aspect is that the objectives hierarchy for a particular problem is<br />

not unique. Keeney and Raiffa argue that ―whether one arrangement is better than another<br />

is mainly a matter of the particular points the decision maker and the analyst wish to<br />

make.‖ 96<br />

4.3.1 Attributes<br />

Though the hierarchy described in the previous section represented an important<br />

achievement in the development of the qualitative part of the model, meaningful<br />

attributes to the lower level objectives still needed to be defined. This step was<br />

accomplished, based on personal expertise, research, and elicitations with experts. The<br />

goal was to identify the set composed of the most important attributes for each<br />

fundamental objective at the lower level of the hierarchy.<br />

Since the process of identifying attributes is ―basically creative in nature‖ 97 ,<br />

several attributes were generated for each objective using a brainstorming type of<br />

approach. Then, the list was refined taking the attributes desired properties in<br />

consideration. For example, the first assessment of the objective 1.1.1(maximize the<br />

95 Ibid.<br />

96 Ibid., 47.<br />

97 Ibid., 64.<br />

51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!