[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

―IMINT - NIIRS National Image Interpretability Rating Scales.‖ http://www.fas.org/irp/imint/niirs.htm. Jackson, Paul, Kenneth Munson, and Lindsay Peacock. Jane's All the World's Aircraft 2008-2009. Jane's Information Group, 2008. Jobim, Nelson. ―A Defesa na Agenda Nacional: O Plano Estratégico de Defesa.‖ Revista Interesse Nacional, 2008. Keeney, Ralph L. Value-Focused Thinking: A Path to Creative Decisionmaking. Harvard <strong>University</strong> Press, 1996. Keeney, Ralph L., and Howard Raiffa. Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. John Wiley & Sons Inc, 1976. Kirkwood, Craig W. Strategic Decision Making: Multiobjective Decision Analysis with Spreadsheets. 1st ed. Duxbury Press, 1996. ―Ministério da Defesa.‖ https://www.defesa.gov.br/index.php/o-que-e-o-md.html. Ministério da Defesa. MD 35-G01 Glossário das Forças Armadas. Brasilia, Brasil, 2007. Ministry of Defense of Brazil. National Strategy of Defense. Brasilia, Brazil: Ministry of Defense of Brazil, 2008. Parnell, G. S., H. W. Conley, J. A. Jackson, L. J. Lehmkuhl, and J. M. Andrew. ―Foundations 2025: A Value Model for Evaluating Future Air and Space Forces.‖ Management Science 44, no. 10 (10, 1998): 1336-1350. Parnell, Gregory S. ―Value Focused Thinking.‖ In Methods for Conducting Military Operational Analysis, edited by Andrew G. Loerch and Larry B. Rainey, 619-665. Military Operations Research Society, 2007. 140
―Petrobras / Pre-salt.‖ http://www.petrobras.com.br/minisite/presal/en/questions%2Danswers/. Schleher, D. Curtis. Electronic Warfare in the Information Age. Artech House Publishers, 1999. ―SIPRI Publications.‖ Stockholm International Peace Research Institute. http://milexdata.sipri.org/result.php4. Smith, Gary R. Logical Decisions - User's Manual. Fairfax, VA: Little Booklets & Manuals, 2008. The Federal Aviation Administration. 8200.1-C United States Standard Flight Inspection Manual. The Federal Aviation Administration, 2009. The U.S. Department of Defense. The Dictionary of Military Terms. Original. Skyhorse Publishing, 2009. US Air Force. AFDD 1-2 Air Force Glossary. US Air Force, 2007. http://www.epublishing.af.mil/. ———. AFDD 2-5.1 Electronic Warfare. US Air Force, 1999. http://www.epublishing.af.mil/. Wilson, Dominic, and Roopa Purushothaman. Dreaming with BRICs: The Path to 2050. Paper. Goldman Sachs, 2003. http://www2.goldmansachs.com/ideas/brics/book/99-dreaming.pdf. Winston, Wayne L. Operations Research: Applications and Algorithms. 4th ed. Duxbury Press, 2003. Winterfeldt, D. von, and W. Edwards. Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research. Cambridge <strong>University</strong> Press, 1986. 141
Page 2 and 3:
Comparing and Prioritizing Aircraft
Page 4 and 5:
DISCLAIMER This work contains ficti
Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tabl
Page 8 and 9:
LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 1:
Page 10 and 11:
Figure 36: Utilities for Cargo (CGO
Page 12 and 13:
ABSTRACT COMPARING AND PRIORITIZING
Page 14 and 15:
Figure 1. Map of South America. 5 R
Page 16 and 17:
- according to recent estimates - c
Page 18 and 19:
transportation to others organizati
Page 20 and 21:
Jobim points out that the lack of r
Page 22 and 23:
2.1 Systems Life Cycle in the BAF 2
Page 24 and 25:
system. The generation of a POR con
Page 26 and 27:
section (OPS) is subordinated to th
Page 28 and 29:
According to Ralph Keeney, the stra
Page 30 and 31:
3. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND METH
Page 32 and 33:
the alternatives under analysis. 3.
Page 34 and 35:
exhaustive representation of the me
Page 36 and 37:
is met but does not directly measur
Page 38 and 39:
Winterfeldt and Edwards argue that
Page 40 and 41:
Moreover, the shape of the utility
Page 42 and 43:
described by Kirkwood. 66 The aggre
Page 44 and 45:
Additive independence is a stronger
Page 46 and 47:
The multiplicative utility function
Page 48 and 49:
4.1 Decision Support 4. MODEL CONST
Page 50 and 51:
of the overarching objective of the
Page 52 and 53:
Figure 9. Decision Frame with Funda
Page 54 and 55:
Force Application Force Awareness A
Page 56 and 57:
The following definitions were adop
Page 58 and 59:
Engagement Attack precisely Attack
Page 60 and 61:
different from engaging a target in
Page 62 and 63:
Figure 19. Fundamental Objectives H
Page 64 and 65:
capability to engage targets in the
Page 66 and 67:
FORCE AWARENESS 2 DETECTION 2.1 INT
Page 68 and 69:
4.3.2 Assumptions As described befo
Page 70 and 71:
Using the objectives hierarchy in f
Page 72 and 73:
The next step was to verify the add
Page 74 and 75:
was found to be utility independent
Page 76 and 77:
An exponential SUF formula was used
Page 78 and 79:
4.3.4 Assessing weights Utility Fig
Page 80 and 81:
A2.4 Endurance ranged from 0 to 5,
Page 82 and 83:
5.1 Populating the Model 5. VALUE M
Page 84 and 85:
to replace Helicopter B (HLB), whic
Page 86 and 87:
OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY Utility for
Page 88 and 89:
1.000 Utility 0.000 Utility 1.000 0
Page 90 and 91:
the information already provided by
Page 92 and 93:
This type of analysis looks for poi
Page 94 and 95:
The great variations in the utility
Page 96 and 97:
Utility 0.560 0.000 0 100 Figure 42
Page 98 and 99:
As before, the weights variations w
Page 100 and 101:
used to check the effects of these
Page 102 and 103: The actual thresholds can be define
Page 104 and 105: 8. CONCLUSION Brazil is a huge coun
Page 106 and 107: Finally, this research intends to f
Page 108 and 109: 1.2 Maximize the survivability capa
Page 110 and 111: 4 Maximize the Force Support capabi
Page 112 and 113: A1.6 Scope See A1.2 A1.7 Scope See
Page 114 and 115: A 2.11 Capacity Amount of data that
Page 116 and 117: APPENDIX 3 UTILITY FUNCTIONS 1 Maxi
Page 118 and 119: 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0
Page 120 and 121: 1.2 Maximize the survivability capa
Page 122 and 123: 2.1.2 In the surface. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4
Page 124 and 125: Utility Figure A3.17 - A2.7 Coverag
Page 126 and 127: 2.3.2 Using data 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
Page 128 and 129: 3.2 Maximize the airlift capability
Page 130 and 131: Utility 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0 0 2
Page 132 and 133: 1Force Application 0.3208 2 Force A
Page 134 and 135: 2 Force Awareness 0.3448 3 Force Mo
Page 136 and 137: 3 Force Mobility 0.1724 4 Force Sup
Page 138 and 139: CARGO (CGO) Medium lift transport
Page 140 and 141: UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) Medi
Page 142 and 143: South Atlantic scenario: National o
Page 144 and 145: 2. Force Awareness Table A7-3. Syst
Page 146 and 147: APPENDIX 8 GLOSSARY anti-submarine
Page 148 and 149: econnaissance aircraft - aircraft e
Page 150 and 151: REFERENCES Bizzi, Luiz Augusto, Jo
Page 154 and 155: Winterfeldt, Detlof von, and Ralph
show all

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?