[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

An increase in the weight on Force Mobility yields an increase in the utility of
HLA and a decrease in the utility of UAV. This is a result of the HLA‘s capability to
operate in unprepared runways. A decrease in weight would produce inverse effects.
Figure 42 shows that the weight line is over the switchover point between these two
alternatives. As in the previous case, there is also a switchover point between UAV and
CGO relatively close to the weight line.
The results show that an increase of 10% in the weight on Force Mobility will
change the ranking order between UAV and CGO. This is an intuitive result, since
CGO‘s main purpose is to provide mobility to the force. The ranking order of the other
alternatives remains unchanged.
ACFT Force Mob.
(16.98%)
Table 7. Variation of Weight on Force Mobility.
ACFT Force Mob.
(26.98%)
83
ACFT Force Mob.
(6.98%)
FTR 0.488 FTR 0.462 FTR 0.534
ASW 0.415 ASW 0.37 ASW 0.471
UAV 0.272 CGO 0.275 UAV 0.313
CGO 0.23 UAV 0.245 CGO 0.212
HLA 0.167 HLA 0.177 HLA 0.17