- Page 2 and 3: Comparing and Prioritizing Aircraft
- Page 4 and 5: DISCLAIMER This work contains ficti
- Page 6 and 7: TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tabl
- Page 8 and 9: LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 1:
- Page 10 and 11: Figure 36: Utilities for Cargo (CGO
- Page 12 and 13: ABSTRACT COMPARING AND PRIORITIZING
- Page 14 and 15: Figure 1. Map of South America. 5 R
- Page 18 and 19: transportation to others organizati
- Page 20 and 21: Jobim points out that the lack of r
- Page 22 and 23: 2.1 Systems Life Cycle in the BAF 2
- Page 24 and 25: system. The generation of a POR con
- Page 26 and 27: section (OPS) is subordinated to th
- Page 28 and 29: According to Ralph Keeney, the stra
- Page 30 and 31: 3. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND METH
- Page 32 and 33: the alternatives under analysis. 3.
- Page 34 and 35: exhaustive representation of the me
- Page 36 and 37: is met but does not directly measur
- Page 38 and 39: Winterfeldt and Edwards argue that
- Page 40 and 41: Moreover, the shape of the utility
- Page 42 and 43: described by Kirkwood. 66 The aggre
- Page 44 and 45: Additive independence is a stronger
- Page 46 and 47: The multiplicative utility function
- Page 48 and 49: 4.1 Decision Support 4. MODEL CONST
- Page 50 and 51: of the overarching objective of the
- Page 52 and 53: Figure 9. Decision Frame with Funda
- Page 54 and 55: Force Application Force Awareness A
- Page 56 and 57: The following definitions were adop
- Page 58 and 59: Engagement Attack precisely Attack
- Page 60 and 61: different from engaging a target in
- Page 62 and 63: Figure 19. Fundamental Objectives H
- Page 64 and 65: capability to engage targets in the
- Page 66 and 67:
FORCE AWARENESS 2 DETECTION 2.1 INT
- Page 68 and 69:
4.3.2 Assumptions As described befo
- Page 70 and 71:
Using the objectives hierarchy in f
- Page 72 and 73:
The next step was to verify the add
- Page 74 and 75:
was found to be utility independent
- Page 76 and 77:
An exponential SUF formula was used
- Page 78 and 79:
4.3.4 Assessing weights Utility Fig
- Page 80 and 81:
A2.4 Endurance ranged from 0 to 5,
- Page 82 and 83:
5.1 Populating the Model 5. VALUE M
- Page 84 and 85:
to replace Helicopter B (HLB), whic
- Page 86 and 87:
OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY Utility for
- Page 88 and 89:
1.000 Utility 0.000 Utility 1.000 0
- Page 90 and 91:
the information already provided by
- Page 92 and 93:
This type of analysis looks for poi
- Page 94 and 95:
The great variations in the utility
- Page 96 and 97:
Utility 0.560 0.000 0 100 Figure 42
- Page 98 and 99:
As before, the weights variations w
- Page 100 and 101:
used to check the effects of these
- Page 102 and 103:
The actual thresholds can be define
- Page 104 and 105:
8. CONCLUSION Brazil is a huge coun
- Page 106 and 107:
Finally, this research intends to f
- Page 108 and 109:
1.2 Maximize the survivability capa
- Page 110 and 111:
4 Maximize the Force Support capabi
- Page 112 and 113:
A1.6 Scope See A1.2 A1.7 Scope See
- Page 114 and 115:
A 2.11 Capacity Amount of data that
- Page 116 and 117:
APPENDIX 3 UTILITY FUNCTIONS 1 Maxi
- Page 118 and 119:
1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0
- Page 120 and 121:
1.2 Maximize the survivability capa
- Page 122 and 123:
2.1.2 In the surface. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4
- Page 124 and 125:
Utility Figure A3.17 - A2.7 Coverag
- Page 126 and 127:
2.3.2 Using data 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
- Page 128 and 129:
3.2 Maximize the airlift capability
- Page 130 and 131:
Utility 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0 0 2
- Page 132 and 133:
1Force Application 0.3208 2 Force A
- Page 134 and 135:
2 Force Awareness 0.3448 3 Force Mo
- Page 136 and 137:
3 Force Mobility 0.1724 4 Force Sup
- Page 138 and 139:
CARGO (CGO) Medium lift transport
- Page 140 and 141:
UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) Medi
- Page 142 and 143:
South Atlantic scenario: National o
- Page 144 and 145:
2. Force Awareness Table A7-3. Syst
- Page 146 and 147:
APPENDIX 8 GLOSSARY anti-submarine
- Page 148 and 149:
econnaissance aircraft - aircraft e
- Page 150 and 151:
REFERENCES Bizzi, Luiz Augusto, Jo
- Page 152 and 153:
―IMINT - NIIRS National Image Int
- Page 154 and 155:
Winterfeldt, Detlof von, and Ralph