[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The aggregation with an additive model is given by the following equation: 74<br />
u(x1…xN)=<br />
iui(xi), where<br />
u = overall utility function<br />
xi = measurement (level, degree) of x on attribute i<br />
ui = single-attribute utility function (attitude toward risk is embodied)<br />
ki = weight of attribute (indicate value tradeoffs)<br />
If AI does not hold, it is needed to build a utility function that permits interactions<br />
among the attributes. In such cases, the multiplicative utility function can be used. In the<br />
case of more than 2 attributes, the multiplicative form requires a stronger version of<br />
utility independence, in which each subset of attributes must be UI of the remaining<br />
attributes. In the case of n attributes, n utility independence assumptions would be<br />
required. 75<br />
This means that it should be possible to partition the attributes in two subsets, and<br />
then consider lotteries in one subset, ―holding the attributes in the other subset fixed.‖ 76 If<br />
the preferences for the lotteries remain unchanged, regardless of the level of the<br />
remaining attributes, ―the multiplicative utility function should provide a good model of<br />
the decision maker‘s preferences.‖ 77<br />
74 Winterfeldt and Edwards, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, 276.<br />
75 Keeney and Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, 292.<br />
76 Clemen, Making Hard Decisions, 660.<br />
77 Ibid.<br />
33