02.08.2013 Views

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The aggregation with an additive model is given by the following equation: 74<br />

u(x1…xN)=<br />

iui(xi), where<br />

u = overall utility function<br />

xi = measurement (level, degree) of x on attribute i<br />

ui = single-attribute utility function (attitude toward risk is embodied)<br />

ki = weight of attribute (indicate value tradeoffs)<br />

If AI does not hold, it is needed to build a utility function that permits interactions<br />

among the attributes. In such cases, the multiplicative utility function can be used. In the<br />

case of more than 2 attributes, the multiplicative form requires a stronger version of<br />

utility independence, in which each subset of attributes must be UI of the remaining<br />

attributes. In the case of n attributes, n utility independence assumptions would be<br />

required. 75<br />

This means that it should be possible to partition the attributes in two subsets, and<br />

then consider lotteries in one subset, ―holding the attributes in the other subset fixed.‖ 76 If<br />

the preferences for the lotteries remain unchanged, regardless of the level of the<br />

remaining attributes, ―the multiplicative utility function should provide a good model of<br />

the decision maker‘s preferences.‖ 77<br />

74 Winterfeldt and Edwards, Decision Analysis and Behavioral Research, 276.<br />

75 Keeney and Raiffa, Decisions with Multiple Objectives, 292.<br />

76 Clemen, Making Hard Decisions, 660.<br />

77 Ibid.<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!