[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The great variations in the utility of the UAV and the ASW are an expected effect,<br />
since these aircraft systems are directly related to ISR missions, which contribute directly<br />
to the force awareness. Table 6 shows that no variation occurs in the ranking of the<br />
alternatives when the weight is increased. On the other hand, a decrease of weight by<br />
10% on Force Awareness is enough to invert the ranking between CGO and than UAV.<br />
Utility<br />
0.638<br />
0.047 0 100<br />
ACFT Force Aw.<br />
(37.73%)<br />
Percent of Weight on Force Awareness<br />
Figure 41. Weight Variation on Force Awareness.<br />
Table 6. Variation of Weight on Force Awareness.<br />
ACFT Force Aw.<br />
(47.73%)<br />
82<br />
Anti-submarine (ASW)<br />
Unmanned (UAV)<br />
Fighter (FTR)<br />
Cargo (CGO)<br />
Helicopter A (HLA)<br />
Helicopter B (HLB)<br />
ACFT Force Aw.<br />
(27.73%)<br />
FTR 0.488 FTR 0.5 FTR 0.496<br />
ASW 0.415 ASW 0.457 ASW 0.384<br />
UAV 0.272 UAV 0.331 CGO 0.248<br />
CGO 0.23 CGO 0.239 UAV 0.227<br />
HLA 0.167 HLA 0.169 HLA 0.178