[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Utility<br />
0.560<br />
0.000 0 100<br />
Figure 42. Weight Variation on Force Mobility.<br />
Finally, small variations in the weight of Force Support do not show any<br />
significant change in the results of the sensitivity analysis. The utilities of HLA and UAV<br />
vary exactly the same with the variations of weight on Force Support. The variations in<br />
the marginal contribution yielded by HLA are caused by the variations in the utility of<br />
HLB, which has some of its main capabilities linked to the Force Support fundamental<br />
objective (see fig. 43).<br />
ACFT Force Sup.<br />
(14.79%)<br />
Percent of Weight on Force Mobility<br />
Table 8. Variation of Weight on Force Support.<br />
ACFT Force Sup.<br />
(24.79%)<br />
84<br />
Cargo (CGO)<br />
Helicopter A (HLA)<br />
Fighter (FTR)<br />
Helicopter B (HLB)<br />
Anti-submarine (ASW)<br />
Unmanned (UAV)<br />
ACFT Force Sup.<br />
(4.79%)<br />
FTR 0.488 FTR 0.432 FTR 0.546<br />
ASW 0.415 ASW 0.364 ASW 0.461<br />
UAV 0.272 UAV 0.242 UAV 0.306<br />
CGO 0.23 CGO 0.211 CGO 0.267<br />
HLA 0.167 HLA 0.098 HLA 0.227