02.08.2013 Views

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

[Sample B: Approval/Signature Sheet] - George Mason University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY Utility for Helicopter A (HLA)<br />

Helicopter B (HLB)<br />

Total Difference<br />

Total Difference<br />

A3.2 Receiver<br />

A1.10 Navigation<br />

A4.4 Multirole<br />

A1.6 Scope<br />

A1.9 Countermeasures<br />

A2.10 Secure<br />

A2.8 Interoperability<br />

A1.2 Scope<br />

A2.9 Capacity<br />

A1.4 Armament payload<br />

Other<br />

Figure 34. Comparison between Helicopter A (HLA) and Helicopter B (HLB).<br />

Figures 35 to 39 show the results of the remaining alternatives, with their utilities<br />

divided by the four high level fundamental objectives. For example, FTR obtained its<br />

highest utility under the fundamental objective Force Application and the lowest under<br />

the fundamental objective Force Support. The width of each bar is proportional to the<br />

weight of the respective objective.<br />

74<br />

0.265<br />

0.098<br />

0.167<br />

Helicopter B (HLB) Helicopter A (HLA)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!