- Page 2 and 3:
Comparing and Prioritizing Aircraft
- Page 4 and 5:
DISCLAIMER This work contains ficti
- Page 6 and 7:
TABLE OF CONTENTS Page List of Tabl
- Page 8 and 9:
LIST OF TABLES Table Page Table 1:
- Page 10 and 11:
Figure 36: Utilities for Cargo (CGO
- Page 12 and 13:
ABSTRACT COMPARING AND PRIORITIZING
- Page 14 and 15:
Figure 1. Map of South America. 5 R
- Page 16 and 17:
- according to recent estimates - c
- Page 18 and 19:
transportation to others organizati
- Page 20 and 21:
Jobim points out that the lack of r
- Page 22 and 23:
2.1 Systems Life Cycle in the BAF 2
- Page 24 and 25:
system. The generation of a POR con
- Page 26 and 27:
section (OPS) is subordinated to th
- Page 28 and 29:
According to Ralph Keeney, the stra
- Page 30 and 31:
3. THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS AND METH
- Page 32 and 33:
the alternatives under analysis. 3.
- Page 34 and 35:
exhaustive representation of the me
- Page 36 and 37:
is met but does not directly measur
- Page 38 and 39:
Winterfeldt and Edwards argue that
- Page 40 and 41:
Moreover, the shape of the utility
- Page 42 and 43:
described by Kirkwood. 66 The aggre
- Page 44 and 45:
Additive independence is a stronger
- Page 46 and 47:
The multiplicative utility function
- Page 48 and 49:
4.1 Decision Support 4. MODEL CONST
- Page 50 and 51:
of the overarching objective of the
- Page 52 and 53:
Figure 9. Decision Frame with Funda
- Page 54 and 55:
Force Application Force Awareness A
- Page 56 and 57:
The following definitions were adop
- Page 58 and 59:
Engagement Attack precisely Attack
- Page 60 and 61:
different from engaging a target in
- Page 62 and 63:
Figure 19. Fundamental Objectives H
- Page 64 and 65:
capability to engage targets in the
- Page 66 and 67:
FORCE AWARENESS 2 DETECTION 2.1 INT
- Page 68 and 69:
4.3.2 Assumptions As described befo
- Page 70 and 71:
Using the objectives hierarchy in f
- Page 72 and 73:
The next step was to verify the add
- Page 74 and 75: was found to be utility independent
- Page 76 and 77: An exponential SUF formula was used
- Page 78 and 79: 4.3.4 Assessing weights Utility Fig
- Page 80 and 81: A2.4 Endurance ranged from 0 to 5,
- Page 82 and 83: 5.1 Populating the Model 5. VALUE M
- Page 84 and 85: to replace Helicopter B (HLB), whic
- Page 86 and 87: OPERATIONAL CAPABILITY Utility for
- Page 88 and 89: 1.000 Utility 0.000 Utility 1.000 0
- Page 90 and 91: the information already provided by
- Page 92 and 93: This type of analysis looks for poi
- Page 94 and 95: The great variations in the utility
- Page 96 and 97: Utility 0.560 0.000 0 100 Figure 42
- Page 98 and 99: As before, the weights variations w
- Page 100 and 101: used to check the effects of these
- Page 102 and 103: The actual thresholds can be define
- Page 104 and 105: 8. CONCLUSION Brazil is a huge coun
- Page 106 and 107: Finally, this research intends to f
- Page 108 and 109: 1.2 Maximize the survivability capa
- Page 110 and 111: 4 Maximize the Force Support capabi
- Page 112 and 113: A1.6 Scope See A1.2 A1.7 Scope See
- Page 114 and 115: A 2.11 Capacity Amount of data that
- Page 116 and 117: APPENDIX 3 UTILITY FUNCTIONS 1 Maxi
- Page 118 and 119: 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0
- Page 120 and 121: 1.2 Maximize the survivability capa
- Page 122 and 123: 2.1.2 In the surface. 1 0.8 0.6 0.4
- Page 126 and 127: 2.3.2 Using data 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
- Page 128 and 129: 3.2 Maximize the airlift capability
- Page 130 and 131: Utility 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 0 0 2
- Page 132 and 133: 1Force Application 0.3208 2 Force A
- Page 134 and 135: 2 Force Awareness 0.3448 3 Force Mo
- Page 136 and 137: 3 Force Mobility 0.1724 4 Force Sup
- Page 138 and 139: CARGO (CGO) Medium lift transport
- Page 140 and 141: UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLE (UAV) Medi
- Page 142 and 143: South Atlantic scenario: National o
- Page 144 and 145: 2. Force Awareness Table A7-3. Syst
- Page 146 and 147: APPENDIX 8 GLOSSARY anti-submarine
- Page 148 and 149: econnaissance aircraft - aircraft e
- Page 150 and 151: REFERENCES Bizzi, Luiz Augusto, Jo
- Page 152 and 153: ―IMINT - NIIRS National Image Int
- Page 154 and 155: Winterfeldt, Detlof von, and Ralph